![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [ FRANÇAIS I HOME ] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1295 Hwy 2 East Kingston,
ON K7L 4V1 2003-2004 ANNUAL
REPORT
- 2 -
Sustaining Members provide
financial assistance to the
Institute to support continuing education and professional development
activities and other EIC objectives. A.D.
Williams Engineering Inc. ABB
Asea
Brown Boveri Inc. Alcoa
Ltée Bechtel
Canada Inc. Cameco
Corporation Canac
Inc. Canam
Manac Group Cogeco
Inc. Cruickshank
Construction Kingston Delcan Corporation Dessau-Soprin Inc. Development
Engineering (London) Limited Dillon
Consulting Enbridge
Pipelines Inc. Geo-Canada Golder
Associates Great
Lakes Power Ltd. Hatch
Associates Ltd. Honeywell
Limited IMC
Canada Ltd Imperial
Tobacco Ingersoll-Rand
Canada Inc. J.D.
Mollard and Associates Ltd Klohn
Crippen consultants Ltd. Lehigh
Inland Cement Limited Manitoba Hydro NSERC QIT-Fer et Titane Inc. Reinforced
Earth Company Ltd. Ron
Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd SC Infrastructure Inc. Sigmund
Soudack & Associates Inc. Spriet
Associates London Ltd. Stantec
Consulting Ltd. St.
Lawrence Seaway Authority Syncrude
Canada Ltd Tembec
Inc. Terasen
Pipelines The
Corporation of the Township of Strathroy-Caradoc . TABLE
OF CONTENTS EIC Sustaining Members................................................................................. Inside front cover EIC National Council......................................................................................................... Page 4 President ’s Report........................................................................................................... Page 5 Executive Director’s Report........................................................................................... Page 10 Treasurer’s Report.......................................................................................................... Page 11 Canadian Geotechnical Society.................................................................................... Page 11 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering .............................................................. Page 13 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering........................................................................ Page 15 Canadian Society for Engineering Management........................................................ Page 16 Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering........................................................... Page 17 IEEE CANADA................................................................................................................ Page 19 Canadian Nuclear Society............................................................................................. Page 20 Marine Technology Society............................................................................................ Page 23 Canadian Society for Senior Engineers....................................................................... Page 25 Honours, Awards and Fellowships Committee............................................................ Page 26 History and Archives....................................................................................................... Page 27 Technical Professional Development Committee....................................................... Page 27 EIC Financial Statements.............................................................................................................. EIC Participating Partners.............................................................................................. Annex A EIC Organizational Chart................................................................................ Inside back cover EIC NATIONAL
COUNCIL 2003-2004
EIC COMMITTEES
HONOURS,
AWARDS & FELLOWSHIPS Raymond Benson Chairman
HISTORY & ARCHIVES
Raymond Findlay, PhD, FEIC, FIEEE Chairman TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Vijay K. Sood, PhD, FEIC EIC COORDINATING
OFFICE B. John Plant, FEIC,
FIEEE
Executive Director
Huguette D. Findlay
Administrator
EIC President's
Report 1 June 2003 – 31
May 2004 Guy Gosselin As my
two-year term nears an end, I must say it has been a pleasure and a
gratifying
experience to work alongside the dedicated and distinguished
individuals
serving on Council. I may not have
accomplished all of my personal goals, but I will pass on the helm with
the
satisfaction of knowing that excellent progress has been made in many
important
areas, thanks to the help and support of Council members, committee
chairs and
the EIC Office. Let me report on some
of that progress and recognize those responsible: Inter-Society
Collaboration on the Rise My sense
is that EIC member societies are increasingly more open to
collaborative action
on matters of common interest (i.e. championing lifelong learning,
recognizing
excellence through new awards, promoting RedR, engaging in PAGSE
consultations,
and collaborating in important areas such as infrastructure renewal and
emergency preparedness, to name a few).
I am delighted and encouraged by this positive
development: it speaks well
for the increasing relevance of the EIC federation and its continued
ability to
fruitfully advance the interests of member societies, and by extension
those of
the engineering profession. No example of this shines as brilliantly as
the excellent cooperation so far being exhibited in the organisation of
the EIC
Climate Change Conference. Slated
for 2006, it will be the first EIC conference to have been held in
seventeen
years! Climate change will increasingly
impact all of our society, on both a human and economic scale. It is heartening to see the entire Canadian
engineering community so willing to mobilize its collective
intelligence and
know-how to address the key technical challenges that climate change
will
undoubtedly create through more erratic and extreme weather patterns. Within a year of the conference idea being
debated at a special workshop in Kingston (September 2003), a central
theme was
adopted (i.e. the engineering challenges and solutions presented by
climate
change in the 21st century), a planning committee was struck and
drafted a
comprehensive Memorandum of Agreement on the proposed conference, six
member
societies agreed to partner with EIC on a 50-50 cost/benefit sharing
basis, a
well-qualified Conference Chair was appointed (John Grefford), dates
and
location were settled (10-12 May 2006 in Ottawa), and an army of
volunteers
have been assembled and are already active on the conference's many
subcommittees. Such tremendous progress
on a very challenging project has simply been unheard of within EIC
circles in
recent years, and a great deal of appreciation for this success goes to
Council
members, Executive Director John Plant and, lastly, conference Chair
John
Grefford who has literally taken the "bull by the horns" and is doing
a tremendous job harnessing the volunteers' enthusiasm into significant
forward
progress. Notwithstanding these
fantastic efforts to date, a lot remains to be done and continued
inter-society
cooperation, particularly with regards to conference publicity and
participation, will be extremely crucial to the conference's eventual
success. Another example of effective inter-society
collaboration is the unseen work that goes into the very successful
honours and
awards banquet held annually in Ottawa.
The participation rate, in terms of both the number of
high quality
submissions and banquet attendance, has climbed significantly in the
past two
years. This excellent performance can
be credited to the societies' leaderships who actively promote the
program, the
dedication of nominators who research and prepare detailed nomination
cases for
these senior awards, the EIC Honours and Fellowships Committee (ably
chaired by
Ray Benson) which carefully reviews all nominations, and to John Plant
and
Huguette Findlay (EIC's Head Office), who spend an incredible amount of
time
and energy planning all the details so the event can be an enjoyable
and
memorable experience. Teamwork is also the operating mantra for
the EIC History and Archives committee, which have just published on
EIC's web
site an additional six Working Papers on significant historical aspects
of
engineering development in Canada.
These documents are of educational value to engineers of
all stripes and
a very interesting read. I invite all to circulate or reference these
broadly
within your communities of stakeholders. National
Engineering Organizations The level of collaboration amongst Canada's
national engineering organizations (the Canadian Council of
Professional
Engineers, the Association of Consulting Engineers of Canada,
the Canadian
Academy of Engineering, and the Engineering Institute of Canada)
also appears to have reached new heights.
The executive managers of these organizations now meet
on a regular
basis to discuss common engineering issues and opportunities. Over the past two years, two significant new
initiatives have been jointly sponsored: the establishment of Engineers
for
a Safer Canada, which provides a unified voice for all engineers on
the
important issue of infrastructure renewal (Michel Langelier, CSCE Exec
Director, represents EIC on this initiative); and the founding and
operation of
RedR Canada, a charitable organization that provides
qualified
professionals to front-line humanitarian agencies dealing with world
wide
disaster relief and prevention. I am
currently representing the EIC on the RedR Cda Board, serving a 3-year
term as
Vice-Chair. I believe the engineering
profession is much better served through such joint actions by the four
national organizations. EIC's
Engineering Excellence Initiative EIC continues to work to champion the need
for lifelong learning and for engineering practitioners to commit to
continuing
competency development as a hallmark of professional excellence and
ethics. This is indeed a long-term
process, but things are progressing in the right direction with
mandatory
reporting of professional development activities increasingly becoming
the norm
across the country. Following this
year's Speech from the Throne, the EIC sent a letter to the Prime
Minister, the
Right Honourable Paul Martin, commanding his government on the
inclusion of
lifelong learning as an important vehicle for building a 21st
Century economy, and highlighting the need to also support continuing
education
and professional development as a key element of that policy. The EIC (Council member Michel Langelier,
John Plant and myself) have also pursued discussions with senior and
lower
management at Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
(HRSDC) on
the possibility of funding a mentorship program for small and medium
enterprises and the creation of a new HRSDC Sector Council that could
appropriately define and fund labour studies of interest to the
engineering
community. Miscellaneous Finally, I have also been representing the
EIC on the Partnership Group on Science and Engineering
(PAGSE), a
cooperative association of over 20 national organizations that promotes
to
federal parliamentarians issues concerning the nature and importance of
research in science and engineering and its applications to society. The Group meets monthly and organizes a
series of breakfast lectures and an annual symposium on Parliament Hill
to
showcase outstanding Canadian research accomplishments.
The Group also submits an annual brief to
the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance, highlighting
priority areas
of importance to the science and engineering community.
Participation by EIC provides an opportunity
for member societies to influence federal policies affecting
engineering
research priorities and funding. In
closing, I wish to again recognize the tireless and excellent work of
Executive Director John Plant and Office Administrator Huguette Findlay
who
efficiently handle all day-to-day operations and provide outstanding
advice and
cheerful support to EIC Council and its committees.
Thank you both for a job extremely well done. OBJET : Rapport
du président de l’ICI (1er
juin 2003 - 31 mai 2004) Au terme de
mon mandat de deux ans, je dois dire que
ce fut un grand plaisir de travailler en compagnie de gens aussi
dévoués que
mes collègues du c.a. Je n’ai
peut-être
pas atteint tous mes objectifs, mais je cède la place à
mon successeur en
sachant que de grands progrès ont été
réalisés dans nombre de secteurs importants,
grâce à l’appui des membres du conseil, des
présidents des comités et des
permanents de l’Institut canadien des ingénieurs (ICI). Voici un aperçu des réalisations
et des gens
qui en sont principalement responsables. Accroissement
de la collaboration entre les sociétés
membres Je constate
que les sociétés membres de l’ICI sont de
plus en plus ouvertes à la collaboration sur des questions
d’intérêt commun
(i.e. faire avancer la formation permanente, rendre hommage à
l’excellence par
de nouveaux prix, faire la promotion de « RedR »,
participer aux
consultations « PAGSE », et collaborer dans des
secteurs importants
comme la réfection des infrastructures et le degré de
préparation face aux cas
d’urgence.) Je suis ravi de cette
évolution positive, qui témoigne de la pertinence de
cette fédération qu’est
l’ICI et de sa capacité à faire valoir les
intérêts des sociétés membres et de
la profession. J’en cite comme
exemple l’excellente collaboration manifestée jusqu’à ce
jour pour
l’organisation du congrès de l’ICI sur les changements
climatiques. Prévu pour
2006, il s’agit du premier congrès organisé par l’ICI en
17 ans ! Les changements
climatiques vont affecter de plus en plus notre société,
au niveau humain comme
au niveau économique. Il est
encourageant de voir que l’ensemble de la profession au Canada est prêt à se mobiliser pour relever
les défis
techniques que vont poser les changements climatiques en créant
une météo de
plus en plus capricieuse. Avant qu’une année
entière ne se soit écoulée depuis que
l’idée du congrès n’ait été débattue
(Kingston,
septembre 2003), un thème central a été choisi
(i.e. changements climatiques au
21e siècle : défis et solutions en
matière d'ingénierie), un comité
de planification a été créé et a
préparé un protocole d’entente global sur le
congrès projeté, six sociétés membres ont
accepté d’être partenaires de l’ICI
et de partager les coûts et les bénéfices sur une
base 50-50, un président
compétent a été nommé (John Grefford), des
dates et un emplacement ont été
arrêtées (10-12 mai 2006, à Ottawa), et une
armée de bénévoles a été
réunie et
travaille déjà dans les nombreux sous-comités.
De tels progrès dans un projet aussi exigeant
n’auraient pas été
possibles auparavant. Une bonne partie de ce succès est
attribuable aux membres
du c.a., au directeur exécutif John Plant, et, enfin, au
président du congrès,
John Grefford, qui a « pris le taureau par les
cornes » et mis à
profit l’enthousiasme des bénévoles pour réaliser
ces immenses progrès. Malgré
tout ce qui a été accompli, il reste
beaucoup à faire, et la collaboration entre les
sociétés membres, notamment en
matière de publicité et de participation, demeure
essentielle pour assurer le
succès de l’événement. Autre exemple de
collaboration entre les sociétés : tout le travail en
coulisse qu’exige le
banquet des lauréats, qui a lieu à tous les ans à
Ottawa. Le taux de participation, compte
tenu de la
quantité et de la qualité des candidatures et des
présences, a connu une
augmentation importante au cours des deux dernières
années. Cette remarquable
réalisation peut être
portée au crédit des sociétés qui se sont
occupées de faire la promotion du
programme, au dévouement des proposeurs qui recherchent et
préparent les
candidatures aux principaux prix, au comité des distinctions
honorifiques de
l’ICI (sous l’habile direction de Ray Benson) qui examine toutes les
candidatures, et à John Plant et Huguette Findlay (les
permanents de l’ICI),
qui consacrent un temps fou à planifier tous les détails qui font du banquet une fête aussi
agréable
qu’inoubliable. Le travail d’équipe
est également le mode de fonctionnement du comité des
archives et des affaires
historiques de l’ICI, qui vient de publier sur le site web de l’ICI six
autres
études sur d’importants aspects du développement du
génie au Canada. Ces documents ont
une valeur éducative pour
tous les ingénieurs, en plus d’être fascinants à
lire. Je vous invite à faire
connaître ces documents dans vos milieux respectifs. Les
organismes nationaux du génie Le niveau de
collaboration entre les organismes nationaux de génie au Canada
( Conseil
canadien des ingénieurs, Association
des ingénieurs-conseils du Canada, Académie
canadienne du génie, Institut
canadien des ingénieurs) a également atteint des
sommets inégalés. Les
directeurs exécutifs de ces organismes
se rencontrent maintenant sur une base régulière pour
aborder des sujets
d’intérêt commun. Au cours
des deux
dernières années, deux nouvelles initiatives d’importance
ont été commanditées
conjointement : « Engineers
for a Safer Canada », qui permet à la profession
de parler d’une seule
voix dans l’important domaine de la réfection des
infrastructures, (Michel
Langelier, directeur exécutif de la SCGC, y représente
l’ICI ) ; et la création
et le fonctionnement de RedR (Ingénieurs pour le secours en
cas de
catastrophe – RedR Canada), un organisme de bienfaisance qui
fournit une
assistance professionnelle de première ligne aux agences d’aide
humanitaire
pour prévenir et aider en cas de catastrophe sur une base
mondiale. Je représente en ce
moment l’ICI au conseil
canadien de « RedR », dont j’ai été
nommé vice-président pour un
mandat de 3 ans. J’estime que la
profession est beaucoup mieux servie par de telles démarches
conjointes de la part des quatre
organismes nationaux. L’initiative
de l’ICI en matière d’excellence L’ICI continue de
faire la promotion de la formation permanente et d’inciter les
ingénieurs à
constamment mettre à jour leur compétence afin d’assurer
l’excellence de la
profession. Il s’agit d’un processus de
longue durée, mais notre progrès est constant, et le
signalement obligatoire
des activités de perfectionnement est en voie de devenir la
norme dans tout le
pays. Suite au discours du Trône de
cette année, l’ICI a fait parvenir au Premier ministre Paul
Martin une lettre
félicitant son gouvernement pour avoir fait de la formation
permanente un
facteur important pour la réussite de l’économie au 21e
siècle et
pour avoir souligné la nécessité d’aider la
formation permanente et le
perfectionnement dans le cadre de cette politique. L’ICI (M. Michel
Langelier, John Plant et moi-même) ont également poursuivi
des discussions avec
des cadres de plusieurs niveaux du ministère
fédéral du Développement des
ressources humaines sur la possibilité de financer un programme
de mentorat
pour les PME et sur la création d’un nouveau Conseil
chargé de définir et de
financer des études de main d’œuvre susceptibles
d’intéresser notre profession. Divers Enfin, j’ai
également représenté l’ICI au “Partnership
Group on Science and Engineering”
(PAGSE), une association coopérative de plus de 20 organismes
nationaux qui se
consacre aux dossiers du gouvernement fédéral sur la
nature et l’importance de
la recherche en science et en génie et sur les applications dans
la
société. Le groupe se
réunit à chaque
mois et organise une série de petits déjeuners
conférences ainsi qu’un
symposium annuel, sur la colline parlementaire, pour souligner les
réussites
canadiennes en matière de recherche. Le
groupe présente également un mémoire annuel au
comité permanent de la Chambre
des Communes sur les Finances, pour établir des secteurs
prioritaires dans les
domaines des sciences et du génie. La
participation de l’ICI donne l’occasion aux sociétés
membres d’influencer les
politiques fédérales qui touchent aux priorités et
au financement des recherches
dans les domaines du génie. Enfin,
je tiens à
souligner le remarquable travail de notre directeur exécutif,
John Plant, et de
notre administratrice, Huguette Findlay, qui expédient les
affaires courantes
de l’ICI et qui aident et conseillent si bien les membres du conseil
d’administration de l’ICI ainsi que ses comités.
Merci à vous deux pour ces belles performances. REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR B. John Plant, 1 June 2003 – 31 May
2004
Administration: There were no staff changes during the period of the report. The administration of the office is working well. Council Members: David Innes replaced Denis Beaulieu (CSCE), Jean-Francois Legault replaced Andrew G. Hart (CSCHE), Jim Gordon replaced Gordon Thomson (CSEM) and Denis Leboeuf replaced Kerry Rowe (CGS) Continuing Education: Increased use of the registry was experienced with the number of registration now exceeding 24,000. Three new providers were added during the year; The Ontario Society for Professional Engineers, The Canadian Dam Association and the University of Windsor. On the down side, The University of British Columbia, McMaster University and École Polytechnique did not renew their membership. HAF 2004: This major activity of the Institute was again most successful with an attendance of 227. Twenty Fellows, five medal winners and two Honorary Members were recognized. The awardees and their award citations can be found on the website at http://www.eic-ici.ca/english/tour/haf2.html. The mood at the event was very positive. Sustaining Members
Campaign. Despite our efforts the revenue from Sustaining Members continues to decline. The problem is seen to be one of being unable to find appropriate contacts in companies to approach. Membership: The number of Member societies remained unchanged. EIC Career Site: This web based enterprise, launched in 2001, performed reasonably well with approximately 3000 job applicants providing their curriculum vitae. Employer interest grew modestly and net revenues improved to previous levels. Engineer’s Business
Center: Unfortunately
the Business Center is not yet capturing the interest of the members of
our
member societies or sustaining members. TREASURER’S REPORT Richard Bathurst Total
revenues of the Institute including the Fund were $145,807 and total
expenditures $131,675 for net revenue of $14,132. The EIC
Fund had revenues of $82,252 ($79,875 previous year) and expenditures
of
$75,365 ($65,284 previous year) for net revenue of $7887 ($14,591
previous
year). Member society contribution
was down from $33,025 in 2002 to $32,398 in year 2003. Sustaining
member
contributions were down from $40,900 in 2002 to $34,000 in year 2003.
Revenue
was down in the continuing education program with
$21,016 received
compared to $21,040 revenue in 2002. Expenditures
were up very slightly. (ie. $131,675 compared to $131,455). The EIC
spent
approximately $3,667 less in office rent and office equipment.
Professional and
consulting fees decreased from $2230. in year 2002 to $1556. in year
2003. Salaries and benefits
increased to
$81,187 compared to $79,716 in 2002 an increase of $1,421. Expenditures
on the
continuing education program decreased from $2,171 to $284 primarily
due to a
reduction in travel costs for recruiting Participating Partners and
workshops
and on membership services likewise from $8,095. to $3,736. In the latter case travel cost were reduced
due to the conversion of one Council meeting to a teleconference. Investment income decreased
from $26,759 in 2003 to $28,530 in 2002. The EIC Fund continues to be
controlled by an independent Board of Trustees, established in 1996. The Board met twice in September 2003 and in
March 2004 and approved a balanced budget for 2004. Audited financial
statements for the year ending 31 December 2003, for the Institute and
the
Fund, have been prepared in bilingual form by the Ottawa firm Watson
Folkins
Corey LLP Chartered Accountants appointed as EIC auditors are enclosed
in this
Annual Report. As recommended by the
auditors in 1999, the financial positions of EIC’s Operations and the
EIC Fund
are presented in separate financial statements to simplify tax filing
and
clarify the independence of the two funds.
CANADIAN
GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY Suzanne
Lacasse President The
Canadian Geotechnical Society delivers broadly based,
multi-disciplinary
programs and services to its members. At the annual meeting of the
Board of
Directors of the Society in Winnipeg MB in September 2003, the
President
reported that 92 local meetings, workshops, short courses and
conferences were
held during the past year. Membership remains essentially unchanged. At
the end
of 2003 CGS counted 1262 members, very close to the 1286 reported at
the end of
2002, and up more than 10% compared to 2001. The accounts for 2003 were
again
in balance and reserves remain strong. The
Society has local groups in 20 Canadian cities in all parts of the
country. The
Society counts seven technical
divisions: Soil Mechanics and Foundations, Rock Mechanics, Engineering
Geology,
Geosynthetics, Cold Regions Geotechnology, Geoenvironmental
Engineering, and
Hydrogeology. There are also five technical committees: Landslides,
Professional Practice, Computing, Membership, and Education. The Board
approved
a new sub-committee on transportation geotechnics, associated with the
Soil
Mechanics and Foundations Division. The 56th
annual Canadian Geotechnical Conference in Winnipeg in September 2003
was a
technical, social and financial success. It attracted over 400
delegates and
featured about 200 technical papers. The conference was organized in
partnership with the Canadian National Chapter of the International
Association
of Hydrogeologists (IAH-CNC) and the North American Geosynthetics
Society
(NAGS). Profits from the conference were shard between the local CGS
group in
Winnipeg, the national CGS, IAH-CNC and NAGS. During 2003, the Society
was
involved with the following conferences and workshops: a)
International
Conference on Large Dams (CIGB-ICOLD) International Symposium on Major
Challenges in Tailings Dams: Montréal June 2003: b)
2nd
International Symposium on Contaminated Sediments, Québec City,
May 2003. c)
3rd
Canadian Conference on Geotechnique and Natural Hazards (GEOHAZARDS),
Edmonton,
June 2003. d)
56th
Annual Canadian Geotechnical Conference, in partnership with
International
Association of Hydrogeologists – Canadian National Chapter (IAH-CNC)
and the
North American Geosynthetics Society (NAGS). Winnipeg, September 2003 e)
In
addition, many of the CGS local groups held short courses, workshops,
etc. of
one to two days duration, and several were held in association with the
annual
joint conference in Winnipeg. Future
plans include the Society's annual conferences in Québec City
(2004); and
Saskatoon (2005). The following Specialty Conferences are planned for
2004: 1st Canadian Conference for Young
Geotechnical Engineers and Geoscientists in
Québec City; Cold Regions Geotechnique - A Canadian Legacy in
Calgary; and the First International Conference on Environmental
Technology,
Practice and Policy, London ON. In 2005, the International Conference
on
Landslide Risk Assessment will be organized in Vancouver, and in 2006
the CGS
expects to host the 3rd International Conference on Soft Soils
Engineering in
conjunction with the 59th annual Canadian Geotechnical Conference.
Through its
Geoenvironmental and Hydrogeology Divisions, the CGS will actively
support the
EIC-sponsored conference on climate change and the Kyoto Accord planned
for
2006. The
Canadian Geotechnical Society supports the objectives and activities of
the
International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
(ISSMGE).
During this past year, the President, Suzanne Lacasse, worked closely
with her
colleagues in the Geo-Institute of the American Society for Civil
Engineering,
to develop a proposal for improved policies for voting and membership
fees in
the ISSMGE. The
Canadian Geotechnical Society runs a website with separate web pages
for each
of its divisions, regions and committees. The CGS web page is linked to
the
website of the Engineering Institute of Canada, the Canadian Geoscience
Council,
and many other national and international organizations. The Canadian
Geotechnical Journal (NRC Research Press) continues to produce a large
number
of excellent technical papers in 6 issues per year. The Journal ranks
among the
top three Geotechnical Journals in the world.
It is seen as a truly international journal and the
forum of choice for
refereed publication, especially on field investigations and case
studies.
Electronic access to the Journal is available to Canadians at no cost via NRC. Information about the Society
and coming opportunities for professional development are distributed
each
month by e-mail to all members in the form of CGS e-News. The magazine
Geotechnical News is published in Vancouver independently of the CGS.
By
agreement with the publisher, it carries about 6 pages of CGS News
items in
each issue. Work is
progressing on revisions to the Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual
and on a
new manual on Guidelines for Site Characterization. The finalized
documents
will hopefully be offered to CGS members in 2004. Sponsorship
from Canadian industry to the non-profit organization The Canadian
Foundation
for Geotechnique permitted a Cross Canada Tour by Dr. Jack Clark in
October
2003. Dr. John Carter from Sydney University, Australia is currently
completing
plans for a tour to ten cities. Nine companies, part of the CGS
Corporate
Sponsors program, also provided financial support for the activities
offered by
the Society. The CGS
values and encourages efforts to promote engineering through
initiatives such
as the Partnership Agreement for Science and Engineering (PAGSE), and
quadripartite consultations between the EIC, CCPE, CAE and ACEC. The
Society
also encourages greater levels of collaboration at local, national, and
international levels. In this regard, CGS recently entered
collaboration
agreements with the IAH-CNC, the Deep Foundation Institute (DFI) and
the
Geo-Institute of ASCE.
CANADIAN
SOCIETY FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Jean-François Legault President
The
Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering (CSChE) is the national
technical
association representing the field of chemical engineering and the
interests of
chemical engineers in industry, academia and government.
It brings together the diverse chemical
engineering community to exchange knowledge, and enables its members to
provide
responsible technical leadership to benefit society.
Its core purpose is to advance the principles and
practice of
chemical engineering in Canada for the benefit of society Strategic
Plan
The
Strategic Plan was reviewed at the March 2004 CSChE Board meeting. Recognizing membership and financial base
limitations, the CSChE has within its budgeted resources (time –
volunteers
& staff, finances) focused on those activities and programs that
have the
most potential to bring high level returns (financial, membership
recruitment,
membership retention) to the Society and high value benefits to both
members
and non-members. This led to the
following strategic thrusts: ·
Technical
Relevance & Competence ·
Knowing
Chemical Engineers and What They Want ·
Dealing
with Partners & Competitors ·
Visibility
& Influence - How We Communicate ·
Managing Resources
Membership Membership
has continued to increase over the last three years (136 new
members in 2003) and is presently at 1400 members.
This is due to an enhanced marketing approach and better
meeting
the members’ needs. Membership through
our alliance with our American and Mexican partners has also
contributed to
this success. Finances
With the
increase in membership, the finances of the Society have seen an
improvement in
this area of the budget. The 53rd
CSChE conference also generated over $18,000 additional revenue. Although the overall 2003 budget for the
Society was not quite met, it came within $6,000 of achieving the
target. Alliances
Chemical
Institute of Canada (CIC). Under the umbrella of the CIC, the CSChE
cooperates with two sister-organizations, the Canadian Society for
Chemistry
(CSC) and the Canadian Society for Chemical Technology (CSCT), to
promote the
chemical profession in Canada. North
American Alliance of Chemical Engineers (NAAChE).
In
2000 the NAAChE international partnership was signed between the
American
Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), the Instituto Mexicano de
Ingenieros
Quimicos (IMIQ) and the CSChE. In the
fourth year of this partnership, we continue to see members of the
other two
societies purchasing CSChE memberships.
At present, 43 AIChE and IMIQ members (down from 82 in
2003) have
proceeded to do so. A NAAChE
meeting was held during the AIChE Conference in Apr 04.
The CSChE Vice-President, Gerry Phillips,
and myself attended the event with the main objective of rejuvenating
the
Alliance. Progress was made and more
discussion will take place by October 04.
The areas for potential development and/or collaboration
were identified
as sustainability, energy and climatic changes. We
also met with the AIChE President and Executive Director to
discuss the CSChE Strategic Plan and chemical engineering in Canada Engineering
Institute of Canada (EIC). The CSChE is a member of the Engineering
Institute of Canada (EIC). The
Society’s permanent representative shall remain myself. Conferences
The 53rd
CSChE conference took place in Hamilton (26-29
October 2003). The conference was
extremely successful. The constant
support of the National Office in the organization of this conference
was a
major contribution to its success. The
next CSChE conferences are planned for Calgary (3-6 Oct 2004),
Toronto (2005) and Sherbrooke (2006). Technical
Divisions The
technical divisions of the CSChE/CIC are doing very well and offer an
opportunity to chemical engineers to network with other engineers in
the same
area. The newly created Process Safety
Management (PSM) Division is very active and has attracted new members
into the
Society. In fact, it successfully
conducted two Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) Section 200
workshops in 2004 (Edmonton and Toronto).
Both were well attended, generated revenue and most
likely will be
repeated in the near future. Canadian
Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE)
The
CJChE continued to create a deficit in 2003 that was due in part to
the backlog of manuscripts and the extra expenses incurred to catch up. However prompt actions were taken to remedy
the situation. Our objective remains to
increase circulation by 20% and generating net surpluses of 10% by 2005.
CANADIAN SOCIETY
FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING Michel Langelier Executive
Director June 2004
CSCE has gained tremendous momentum, largely by building partnerships towards advancing professional knowledge and the practice of civil engineering. Indeed, in the past year, CSCE has launched several new domestic and international initiatives aimed at creating forums that address issues specific to the needs of our profession/discipline. We have also gained tremendous credibility by the quality of the programs being delivered, aside from witnessing a 9% membership growth. For instance, as part of promoting the importance of life-long learning, this year CSCE met with most of the professional engineering associations to collaborate on this issue. Also, in my capacity as Chair of EIC’s Excellence Initiative Committee (ExIC), I have engaged in several discussions with HRDC to include EIC (and its nine constituent societies) in HRDC’s Engineering Sector Council, whose mandate will primarily deal with designing nation-wide programs aimed at developing a skilled labour workforce to better meet the industry’s needs. In a comparable fashion, CSCE has produced a national education strategy for the National Guide on Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure (NGSMI) which provides recommendations for the next seven years on how to optimize the uptake of the InfraGuide. Meanwhile, our professional development department was busy collaborating with our sections to organize the delivery of 14 different workshops in 7 cities, launching a new in-house customized training program for the industry, and coordinating the delivery of our HRDC/CSCE 2003-2004 internship program. In March 2004, we met with more than 35 Chief Executive Officers of high profile engineering firms to discuss their involvement as corporate members of CSCE, and of the pertinence of our learned society offering services customized to their training needs. The future success of the CSCE will lie in our ability to offer additional leadership workshops to our section chairs, such as the one we held in Niagara-on-the-Lake in the fall of ‘03. Indeed, this workshop built on the importance of learning from our successes, of finding the means to communicate to the community the benefits of working through an association like CSCE on issues affecting our profession, and underlined the importance of marketing the quality of our programming. As we are becoming more visible, CSCE is working to partner with governments, municipalities, professional associations, universities and research organizations, to provide the profession with the tools to inform and influence the public and decision makers in shaping policies that will lead to the optimization of programs instrumental in making our society a prosperous, safe and healthy place to live. We believe that our
efforts of the past few
years have finally started to pay off.
CANADIAN SOCIETY
FOR ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT James Gordon President As
mentioned in last year’s report, the Canadian Society for Engineering
Management (CSEM) continues to enjoy a steady and loyal following in
Western
Canada. The CSEM Chapters located in Calgary, Vancouver and
Edmonton hold
regular luncheon meetings that sponsor presentations from engineers
from all
disciplines In March 2004 the Calgary Chapter was a partner in a very
successful Seminar examining the role ‘Innovative Technology’ plays in
the
Enhancement of Engineering. The key word for the success of this
Seminar of
course being “Partnership.” Elsewhere
in Canada, CSEM is facing the same challenges confronting other learned
societies, the time factor required by monthly meetings and the dollar
risk
factor in the promotion of seminars.
Financially, CSEM remains solvent. Expenses in 2003/2004 have been kept minimal in order to maintain a sound cash position. This of course was necessary while our Administrative problems were being addressed. Fortunately the move of our Administrative Centre from Ottawa to Kingston has overcome many of the frustrations previously felt by both The Board of Directors and General Membership and for this we must thank the Executive Director for EIC, John Plant and the current President of EIC, Guy Gosselin for sanctioning a contractual agreement for the EIC office in Kingston to provide, at a reasonable fee, the necessary administrative assistance CSEM needed so badly at national level. The Board of Directors continues to meet periodically by teleconference to discuss ways to improve the operation and to ensure CSEM will continue to participate as a member of EIC to the full extent of the capability of its manpower and finances.
CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Marc Rosen President Looking Back and Onward
As my two years as President of CSME winds down and I think of the honour it has been to serve our national society, it seems appropriate both to reflect and to look onward. So in this, my final message as CSME President, I take stock of what we’ve accomplished over the last couple years – which I believe is quite substantial – and comment on what I think lies ahead. CSME’s biannual Forum continues to be a strong event. CSME Forum 2004 in London, Ontario looks like it will be a great success. Special efforts have been made to reach out to other members of the mechanical engineering community to ensure CSME is as inclusive as possible. The upcoming CSME Forum, for instance, will include an interesting symposium on Mechanisms, Machines and Mechatronics organized by the Canadian Committee for the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms (CCToMM). Plans for CSME Forum 2006, which is to be held in Calgary, or perhaps a bit further west in the mountains, are well underway. There have been several mini-symposia which have allowed local regions to feature a topic of direct local interest, and which were well attended. Mini-symposia complement the larger Forums, and are expected to grow in numbers. Our student competitions also are thriving. The second CSME Student Paper Competition is running this year, and has attracted much interest. The CSME Design Competition continues to be one of our core activities and grows in appeal. These competitions provide a key link to mechanical engineering students, and foster excellence in interesting and challenging ways. CSME Finances are under control, although more funds are always needed to allow us to improve member services. In line with the need to boost resources, a critical initiative has been launched to increase CSME membership, focusing first on the academic community and then broadening to industry. In parallel, efforts have been expanded to enhance student participation and membership in CSME. These efforts are key to CSME’s future success. Our web site has been overhauled and great reviews were received. The importance of this activity cannot be overstated, as the web site is a key means by which we can enhance the profile of mechanical engineers. In addition, the web site is a key link to our members, which helps us serve them better. Our publications continue to attract interest and provide interesting and high-quality sources of information and news. The CSME Bulletin is more vibrant than ever and keeps both members and non-members aware of many advances in our field. The CSME Transactions continue to be a recognized archival journal for the publication of original and important research, respected and utilized by Canadian and non-Canadians alike. CSME’s relationship to the Engineering Institute of Canada (EIC), the umbrella society for many engineering societies in our country, is stronger than ever, with more joint activity involving CSME, EIC and its other constituent societies occurring than in recent memory. In particular, an interdisciplinary conference on engineering solutions to global warming, jointly organized by EIC and several other societies, including CSME, is planned for 2006 or 2007. CSME has taken seriously its role as a leader of mechanical engineering in Canada by coordinating and organizing regular meetings of the chairs and heads of mechanical engineering departments in Canadian universities. We see these meetings as key in helping shape the future of the profession, and as an important means by which CSME can keep informed of potential challenges, emerging opportunities and new directions. This year’s meeting of chairs and heads will be held in conjunction with Forum 2004. For all that has been accomplished, I sincerely thank all who have contributed their time and energy – be they CSME Board members, active members of local chapters or other volunteers. Without your efforts, CSME cannot function and achieve its mission. Of course, everything that occurs in CSME seems to involve, in one way or another, our Administrative Assistant, Judi Weaver, and I cannot close without thanking her – personally and on behalf of the society. Judi’s tremendous dedication keeps CSME organized and running smoothly and she plays an essential role in coordinating the efforts of our many volunteers. I am confident that the future is bright for both mechanical engineers and CSME. The mechanical engineering profession has always been strong, but has undergone somewhat of resurgence in the last few years. This is evidenced in part by the significant increase in applications to mechanical engineering programs across the country. The increased interest motivated University of Ontario Institute of Technology to develop a Mechanical Engineering program, which will be launched in September 2004. The excitement about mechanical engineering is strongly exhibited by university students. I was tremendously impressed, when I spoke in the early spring at a CSME Student Night at Ryerson University, to see over 70 enthusiastic students turn out. What mechanical engineers may do in the future can only be speculated upon, but I am sure it will be exciting and important. Thus it is
with a touch of sadness that I approach the end of my term as
President. With
great hopes for an increasingly strong CSME, I convey my best wishes to
my
successor. And I thank all CSME members for their trust and support
over the
past two years, and for honouring me with the opportunity to serve as
President
of our great society. I look forward to remaining involved as CSME
marches on,
providing a key Canadian voice to our profession.
Bill Kennedy
President After a decline in 2003, IEEE Canada’s membership has rebounded with an increase of 4% with release of the May 2004 Member Statistics. As of May 2004 membership stood at 13,737 with 10,264 voting members. IEEE Canada saw 10 members elevated to Fellow in 2004. These IEEE Fellows are listed together with their city and citation. Dr. Frederick Nicholas Trofimenkoff, Calgary, for contributions to high temperature instrumentation. Mr. Charles F. Henville, Vancouver, for contributions to power system protective relaying. Prof. Gordon Roberts, Montreal, for contributions to the design and test of analog and mixed-signal integrated circuits, and education Prof. Mohamad A.H. Sawan, Montreal, for contributions to implantable medical devices. Mr. Frank DeWinter, Kitchener, for contributions to the development and application of medium voltage adjustable speed drives Dr. Andrew K.C. Wong, Waterloo, for contributions to machine intelligence, computer vision, and intelligent robotics. Dr. Tarlochan Singh Sidhu, London, for innovations and contributions to the development of digital relaying algorithms Dr. Robert Alexander Hanna, Mississauga, for contributions to the applications of medium voltage adjustable speed drives and power quality. Prof. Ismail Burhan Turksen, Toronto, for contributions to fuzzy logic systems. The first of three meetings for 2004 was held in Niagara Falls in May and preceded the annual Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering. At the conference banquet, the following IEEE Canada awards were handed out. JJ
Archambault Eastern Canada Council Award - Xavier Maldague M.B.
Broughton
Central Canada Council Award - Pelle Westlind E.W.
Glass Western Canada Council Award - Rob Anderson Wallace
S. Read Service Award - Witold Kinsner Outstanding
Engineering Educator Award - Hoang Le-Huy Outstanding
Engineer Award - Haran Karmaker Reginald
Fessenden Medal- Ken Wu McNaughton
Medal - Renato Bosisio Following the banquet, Dr Bosisio gave the inaugural McNaughton Address in which he described his research on microwave measuring techniques. In conjunction with the Spring Region Meeting, a Membership Development Workshop was held. This was the first time the workshop has been held outside of Piscataway, NJ and the first time the workshop was conducted for Section Membership Development Chairs. Sixteen Membership Development Chairs from Canada attended the workshop. To broaden interest in the workshop, IEEE Canada invited one of the American Regions to participate and they sent three members. IEEE Canada is in the process of reviewing its governance structure and the report of the governance committee was reviewed and approved at the Niagara Falls Meeting. The Executive Committee was instructed to add structure to the governance committee’s report and bring back formal motions for approval to the Calgary Meeting in October. A major initiative of IEEE Canada over the next two years is to craft alliances with the provincial licensing bodies for both engineers and technologists / technicians to make them aware of IEEE’s educational products.
Jeremy Whitlock President Prepared by Parviz Gulshani CNS Organization The Canadian Nuclear Society (CNS) is a not-for-profit corporation. It is a technical society whose members are primarily individuals interested or involved in some area of nuclear science and technology. The CNS also accepts as members’ educational institutions such as libraries. The primary objectives of the CNS are to promote the exchange of information and encourage education in nuclear science and technology, and to enhance the professional and technical capabilities of its members. The CNS conducts its affairs through a Board of Directors (or Council), whose members are elected by the membership. The CNS is organized into Branches, Technical Divisions and Committees. The Branches are established in different regions of Canada and organize local functions, such a organizing seminars and educational activities, in fulfilling the CNS goals. The Technical Divisions organize conference, symposia, and courses on topics of interest to its members in nuclear science and technology. CNS Committees are established as needed to manage or carry out activities of the Society. The CNS communicates special events, news and other technical matters to its membership through its CNS Bulletin (published quarterly), through its newsletter C-News (issued periodically), via frequent e-mails to the membership, and via its website (www.cns-snc.ca). 2003-2004 CNS
Activities In the year June 2003 – June 2004, CNS activities were as follows. The Technical Divisions organized a number of conferences, symposia, and workshops:
The following events are currently being organized:
Maintenance Conference, Toronto, Ontario, 2005 November 6-8 The CNS is sponsoring the following activities:
Activities of the CNS Technical Committees were as follows:
· The Education Committee continued its efforts to educate the public on nuclear science and technology. It organized a Workshop for Science Teachers at McMaster University on 2004 May 24. · The CNS creating a CNS Journal registered with ISSN for publication of papers on nuclear science and technology and Canadian nuclear issues.
BranchesEach of the CNS local Branches organized activities appropriate to its local region. These activities included:
Ferial El-Hawary President This is
the 3rd year for the MTS being one of the EIC member societies. MTS has
a great
interest in promoting and up dating on the marine related technology in
all
sectors: Offshore resources (Oil and Gas), Navy and Defence,
Government
Agencies and Academia.
Conferences
and Specialty Workshops
We had our AGM as a joined Dinner Speaker
Event with the local IEEE/OES Chapter on
Friday,
January 23, 2004, which it was very well attended. The Tour's confirmed date is in June
'04. Halifax Event is on June 28, 2004 as dinner and a
presentation on: AVIONICS FOR MANNED
SPACE by Dr. Myron Kayton, Kayton Consultant, Los-Angeles, CA.
Len Bateman President The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society
for
Senior Engineers was held in Halifax on May 15, 2004.
The incoming chairman, Nelson Ferguson, held a cocktail
reception
in his home the evening before the meeting.
The Board met early the next morning and concluded the
business by 1.30
PM, after which the Board and their wives were treated to a two-hour
trip
around the harbor by Gordon Weld on his impressive yacht.
The weather cooperated with a beautiful
sunny day. It was an impressive trip
from the owners dock in the Northwest Arm to the harbor entrance and up
to
Bedford Basin and back. The members then returned to the hotel and
changed for
dinner at the Royal Nova Scotia Yacht Squadron Club House.
The brief Annual meeting followed the dinner
attended by a group of thirty members and ladies. There is continued interest in the
organization and
efforts to hold luncheons at which a speaker is present and at which
members
can renew acquaintances has produced some impressive results. In addition to the luncheons that were being
held in Victoria, Vancouver and Winnipeg, luncheons have been held in
Edmonton
and Montreal. The objective is to have
local members convene to enjoy the opportunity to meet with their
friends and
hear something of interest about important developments in their
communities,
or the country at large. Our members continue to send in their
contributions,
which help us to support such organizations as the Youth Science Fair,
the
NALTA project and other activities which are designed to encourage the
youth of
our high schools to pursue a career in Engineering or the Sciences.
Those who
follow these activities are deeply impressed by the work done by the
students. This in itself also encourages
our members
to continue to lend their financial support. This past year we wrote to all the
Professional
Engineering Associations and the Canadian Council to advise them of our
efforts
to provide a forum for their retired members.
Some results were forthcoming, but these efforts will be
continued. We produced a special Newsletter in January
to
apprise every one of our new name and of our efforts to open our
membership to
all retired engineers. We do not charge
membership dues but anticipate that our members will continue to
financially
support the organization with their donations, which are tax
deductible, and
for which the treasurer will issue a Charitable Donation Receipt. We again request the other Member Societies of the Engineering Institute of Canada to send us the lists of their retired members so that they can keep in the loop with their confreres and also participate in the important work of the CSSE - encouraging the youth of our country to get involved in a rewarding career. Some feel that there will be a severe shortage of Engineers in the near future and we can help to keep this from happening. HONOURS, AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS COMMITTEE Raymond Benson
Chair
The
Honours Awards and Fellowships (HAF) Committee concluded their
work for the year 2003, with the successful annual EIC meeting held on
March 6,
2004. Twenty-seven of Canada's top engineers were honoured at the
awards
dinner convened in the National Arts Centre in Ottawa. Of the
twenty-seven
persons so honoured, twenty were inducted as Fellows of the
Institute.
Five received medals, and two new honourary member of the institute was
accepted. Candidates selected for possible awards were initially
proposed
by the constituent societies of the EIC. Following, the committee
selected the final candidates in accordance with the guidelines of the
institute, and recommended a final list to the National Council of the
EIC. The council made the final selection, with the process
coordinated by John Plant. Presentations
of the awards were made formally at the March 6,
2004 banquet, hosted by Guy Gosselin, EIC President. Co-hosts of the
presentations were Drs. Djaouida Chenaf and Ray Benson. Following
is the
current makeup of the HAF Committee. Ray
Benson - Chairman Zdravko Duvnjak - CSChE P. Daniel Burns - CSCE Amarjit Banwatt - CSME Richard Bathurst - CGS Colin Campbell - CSEM Abdel Sebak – IEEE Edward G. Price - CNS The list of award winners is as
follows: Dr. David E. Allen - Julian C.
Smith Medal Dr. Edward C. McRoberts - Julian
C. Smith Medal Dr. Norman C. Beaulieu – K.Y. Lo
Medal Dr. James Graham - John B.
Stirling Medal Dr. Dennis E. Becker - Canadian
Pacific Railway Engineering Medal Master Ryan Hreljac - Honourary
Member EIC Dr. David Strangway – Honourary
Member EIC Fellowships: Dr. Lee S. Barbour Dr. Rama Bhat Mr. Fred Boyd Dr. Peter Buckland Dr. David M. Cruden Mr. Ralph E. Crysler Dr. M. Jamal Deen Dr. Robert W. Donaldson Dr. Andrew Eisenhauer Dr. Amin Ghali Dr. John Ross Grace Dr. David Haccoun Dr.Terrence William Hoffman Mr. Ralston E. MacDonnell Dr. Denis Mitchell Dr. Subbarayan Pasupathy Dr. Kenneth C. Porteous Dr. Adam Skorek Dr. Stavros Tavoularis Dr. Anthony A. Tawil The HAF Committee was
pleased to have been
involved in the awards program for the year 2003 and is looking forward
to
participating in next year's program. HISTORY AND ARCHIVES Raymond Findlay Chair Nil Report Technical Professional Development Committee Vijay K. Sood Chair The TPDC
had two meetings in 2003. The first one took place in March 2003 in
Ottawa, and
the second one in Kingston in Sept. 2003. One item
under consideration by the TPDC was the proposed EPIC Award. An initial
proposal
was brought forward since Dr H. Ahuja of EPIC offered to contribute
funds to
initiate this award. However, after discussions at the Sept 2003
meeting of the
TPDC, a decision to implement this award was tabled pending further
evaluation/discussions with Dr. Ahuja. This decision is still pending.
Recent
contact with EPIC has taken place and it is hoped that the TPDC can
move this
project forward to a successful implementation. A second
item under consideration by the TPDC was collaboration with the CCPE
for a
project dealing with the integration of international engineering
graduates in
Canada. In April 2004, the TPDC Chair attended a meeting convened in
Ottawa by
the CCPE and Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC). This meeting
dealt with
the engineering profession in Canada, jurisdiction, accreditation and
how these
issues affect International Engineering Graduates (IEGs). A federal
government
department (HRDC), which is funding this project, has concerns about
the impact
of these issues on the engineering profession and foreign credentials. Each
year, thousands of international engineering graduates (IEGs) immigrate
to
Canada. They may be seasoned engineering professionals who have been
practicing
in their native countries, recently engineering graduates or they may
be
working in jobs that would be technologist or technician positions in
Canada.
Regardless of which group they fall into, many of these IEGs arrive in
Canada
expecting to begin work as engineers and are unable to find engineering
employment. The
Canadian Council of Professional Engineers (CCPE), its provincial and
territorial partners, and Human Resources Development Canada have
recognized
the importance of addressing this critical employment issue. Together,
they
have embarked on a joint initiative to solve the integration problem —
to
better enable IEGs to gain employment in Canada and earn licenses as
professional engineers (P.Eng. or ing.) in their province or territory
of
residence. Launched
in January 2003, From Consideration to Integration (FC2I) is a
three-phase
project that aims to: •
Research the Canadian immigration process, provincial and territorial
engineering licensing procedures and approaches to assessing the
credentials of
IEGs, examine licensing processes of other professions and in other
engineering
jurisdictions, and gather feedback from IEGs, settlement workers and
from those
who employ engineers (Phase
I); •
Analyze the information gathered in Phase I, determine where the
process of
integration needs improvement, develop models, processes and tools to
better
equip IEGs, develop consistent and transparent foreign credential
recognition
processes for licensing In May
2004, the recommendations made by this working group were approved by
the CCPE.
The Minister responsible has now sanctioned phase 3 of this project and
the
work to implement the recommendations will commence in the Fall of 2004. The TPDC is actively following this project. Annex A EIC PARTICIPATING PARTNERS The
following course providers are partnered with EIC to augment its Continuing
education and professional development activities BH Engineering Systems Ltd British Columbia Institute of Technology Canadian Electricity Forum Canadian Institute for Energy Training Canadian Wood Council Concordia University CSA International C-TEP Centre for Transportation Engineering
and
Planning Dalhousie University École Polytechnique EDUMINE EPIC Education Programs Innovations Centre GEO-Slope International Ltd. GECS (Global Education & Consulting
Services) Golder Associates École des Hautes
Études
Commerciales Kadon Electro Mechanical Services Ltd Machinery Condition Monitoring Inc. McMaster University National Research Council Ontario Good Roads Association RedR Canada Royal Military College Ryerson University Thermoshare Inc. University of British Columbia University of Calgary University of Ottawa University of Toronto University of Windsor Engineering Institute of Canada Annual Report 2002 - 2003 CONTENTS
IEEE CANADA Canadian Nuclear Society Marine Technology Society Honours, Awards and Fellowships Committee History and Archives Canadian Society for Senior Engineers EIC Financial Statements EIC Participating Partners EIC Organizational Chart |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Audited Financial Statement for 2002
The EIC has two accounts, The "Fund" (charitable status) and The "Operating Account". EIC FUND |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| EIC OPERATING ACCOUNT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
EIC NATIONAL COUNCIL 2002-2003
| President EIC | Guy Gosselin, M.B.A., P.Eng. |
| President Elect EIC | Maja Veljkovic, P.Eng. |
| Past President EIC | Ken W. Putt, FEIC, FCSEM |
| Treasurer EIC | Djaouida Chenaf, PhD |
| President CGS | Suzanne Lacasse, PhD, |
| President CSCE | Denis Beaulieu, PhD, FCSCE |
| President CSChE | Andrew Hart, FCSChE, |
| President CSEM | J. Gordon Thomson, FEIC |
| President CSME | Marc Rosen, PhD, FCSME, FEIC |
| President IEEE Canada | Mohamed El-Hawary, FEIC |
| President CNS | J.E. (Ian) Wilson |
| President MTS | Ferial El-Hawary |
| President CSSE | FEICLen Bateman |
EIC COMMITTEES
HONOURS, AWARDS & FELLOWSHIPS
Raymond Benson, Chairman
HISTORY & ARCHIVES
Andrew H. Wilson, FEIC, FCSME, Chairman
TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Vijay K. Sood, PhD, FEIC
EIC Headquarters
B. John Plant, FEIC, FIEEE, Executive Director
Huguette D. Findlay, Office Administrator
EIC SUSTAINING MEMBERS / Membres Supporteurs de l’ICI
Sustaining Members provide financial assistance to the Institute to
support
continuing education and professional development activities and other
EIC objectives.
| Ainley Graham and Associates Limited
Bechtel Canada Inc. Bombardier Inc. Cameco Corporation Canac Inc. Canam Manac Group Cogeco Inc. Cruickshank Construction Kingston CWA Structural Engineers Ltd. Delcan Corporation Dessau-Soprin Inc. Development Engineering (London) Limited Dillon Consulting Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Geo-Canada Golder Associates Great Lakes Power Ltd. Hatch Associates Ltd. Honeywell Limited IMC Canada Ltd Imperial Tobacco IPSCO Inc. |
ABB Asea Brown Boveri Inc.J.D. Mollard and Associates Ltd
John Deere Limited, Welland Works Klohn Crippen consultants Ltd. Lehigh Inland Cement Limited MTE Consultants Inc. NSERC QIT-Fer et Titane Inc. Reinforced Earth Company Ltd. Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd SC Infrastructure Inc. Société Canadienne de métaux Reynolds Spriet Associates Stantec Consulting Ltd. St. Lawrence Seaway Authority Syncrude Canada Ltd Tembec Inc. The Corporation of the Township of Strathroy-Caradoc Thurber Management Ltd. Trans Mountain Pipe Line Company Ltd. |
In accepting the presidency in September 2002, I pledged to focus my efforts on six specific objectives. Although much remains to be accomplished, I am happy to report good progress on many of these objectives.
1) Establish a new program, in partnership with other engineering organizations such as CCPE and ACEC, to officially recognize individuals and firms that demonstrate active commitment to continued excellence through lifelong learning, i.e. continuing education (CE) and professional development (PD) activities. This would require developing and promulgating a (voluntary) standard on recommended minimum levels of CE and PD activity, benchmarked against current practices in other professions. John Plant and I promoted this concept through discussions with Council members, executives of CCPE, CAE, ACEC, and PEO, as well as EIC's Technical Professional Development Committee (TPDC). A new EIC Ad Hoc Committee set up to recommend possible advocacy roles for EIC is also receptive to the concept of EIC recommending minimum continuing levels of technical and business education within the engineering community as part of a broad Engineering Excellence initiative. In Ontario, there appears to be a movement to reconsider the hot subject of mandatory professional development. Quoting recent surveys by the Ontario College of Teachers, which indicates that a majority of the 37 self-regulating bodies in the province require their members to take part in professional development, PEO seems intent on reviving the debate of whether fulfilling a mandatory professional development requirement should be a condition of licence renewal. Across the country, the trend by engineering regulatory bodies is towards active monitoring of competence, including mandated reporting. All in all, this spells refreshing good news for EIC member societies and Participating Partners that struggle to provide viable qualified continuing education and training programs.
2) Ensure that all EIC committees are fully staffed with updated programs. This objective is well in hand with the revamping and membership expansion of the TPDC and the setting up of new ad hoc committees to deal with emerging issues of importance to EIC's continuing relevance to the profession. Other committees are all fully staffed and active with very successful programs as reported later in this annual report.
3) Clarify and formalize EIC's advocacy role with the development of a program of activities, its validation with stakeholders and funding. As mentioned, an Ad Hoc committee was established and has already drafted preliminary recommendations to be considered at June meeting of Council.
4) Clarify and validate EIC's role in delivering services on behalf of member societies. An article summarising EIC's history and describing the services and benefits to the profession was written and published in some of the magazines or bulletins of member societies. John Plant and I also attended board meetings of some of our member societies and given an opportunity to describe EIC's programs and services.
5) Enhance the value and recognition of the Honours and Awards program with pre and post announcements in newsletters of professional bodies. The 40% increase over last year's record attendance at EIC's Annual Banquet in March is encouraging evidence of the high calibre of the awardees and the popularity of the program. Still, more can be done in promoting the event with the non-engineering sectors, including politicians, to enhance the overall awareness of engineers' contribution to society.
6) Augment the value of the Annual Banquet experience by annexing an educational/networking session. A keynote presentation on the newly launched RedR Canada (Registered engineers for disaster Relief, a non-profit organisation that qualifies and trains technical personnel for oversees disaster relief assignments) was planned but had to be cancelled due to under-subscription. Although a disappointing result, I still believe in the potential and appeal to enlarge the annual gala program with a workshop or conference on a topic of broad engineering interest (e.g. ramifications of the Kyoto accord) and I will hence continue to pursue this.
In closing this report, I shall want to issue a warm welcome to the Canadian Society for Senior Engineers (formerly the Life Members Organisation), which gained admission as a full-fledged EIC member society in September 2002. I also wish to recognise the tireless and excellent work of Executive Director John Plant, and Administrative Officer Huguette Findlay, who handle all the day-to-day activities and provide outstanding and cheerful support to EIC Council and all its committees.
Rapport du président de l'ICI (1er juin 2002 - 31 mai 2003) - Guy Gosselin
En acceptant la présidence, en septembre 2002, je me suis engagé à concentrer mes efforts sur six objectifs précis. Même s'il reste beaucoup à faire, je suis heureux de signaler qu'il y a eu progrès par rapport à plusieurs de ces objectifs.
1) Création, en partenariat avec d'autres organismes de génie comme le Conseil canadien des ingénieurs (CCI) et l'Association des ingénieurs-conseils du Canada (AICC), d'un nouveau programme de reconnaissance officielle des personnes et entreprises qui témoignent leur engagement actif en matière d'excellence, en poursuivant ou supportant des activités de formation permanente et de perfectionnement. Cette initiative exigerait l'élaboration et la mise en œuvre (sur une base volontaire) de normes quant aux exigences minimales en matière de formation permanente et de perfectionnement, établies en tenant compte des pratiques actuelles des autres professions. John Plant et moi avons mis de l'avant cette notion lors de nos échanges avec les administrateurs, les dirigeants du CCI, de l'Académie canadienne du génie, de l'AICC et de l'association des ingénieurs professionnels de l'Ontario (PEO), ainsi que du comité technique de perfectionnement de l'ICI. Un nouveau comité ad hoc de l'ICI, créé pour recommander à l'ICI la défense de certains intérêts, s'est également dit favorable à la notion d'exigences minimales en matière de formation technique et commerciale pour la profession, dans le cadre d'un vaste programme en faveur de l'excellence au sein de la profession.
En Ontario, il semble y avoir un mouvement en faveur de l'étude de la notion de formation permanente obligatoire. De récents sondages de l'Ordre des enseignantes et enseignants de l'Ontario révèlent qu'une majorité des 37 organismes d'auto réglementation de la province exigent que leurs membres participent à des activités de formation permanente ; "Professional Engineers Ontario" semble vouloir soulever à nouveau le débat sur l'opportunité d'imposer des exigences en matière de perfectionnement au moment du renouvellement du permis de pratique. Dans l'ensemble du pays, les organismes régissant la profession d'ingénieur ont tendance à s'intéresser davantage à surveiller activement la compétence des membres, allant jusqu'à imposer un certain contrôle. Dans l'ensemble, il s'agit de très bonnes nouvelles pour les sociétés membres et les partenaires participants de l'ICI, qui s'efforcent d'offrir des programmes de formation permanente viables et de haute qualité.
2) Voir à ce que tous les comités de l'ICI disposent des ressources humaines nécessaires et des programmes dynamiques. Cet objectif est en bonne voie d'être atteint, grâce à la réorganisation et à l'accroissement du nombre de membres du comité technique de perfectionnement et à l'organisation de nouveaux comités ad hoc pour étudier les problèmes émergents concernant la pertinence de l'ICI pour l'ensemble de la profession. Les autres comités ont des effectifs complets et mènent des programmes qui donnent de très bons résultats, tel que signalé plus loin dans ce rapport annuel.
3) Préciser et officialiser le rôle de défenseur de l'ICI en élaborant un programme d'activités, en le faisant valider par les intéressés, et en assurant son financement. Tel que mentionné, un comité ad hoc a été créé et a déjà élaboré des recommandations préliminaires qui seront étudiées par le conseil d'administration lors de la réunion du mois de juin.
4) Préciser et valider le rôle de l'ICI dans l'exécution de services au nom des sociétés membres. Un article résumant l'histoire de l'ICI et décrivant les services et les avantages pour la profession a été rédigé et publié dans certaines revues et bulletins des sociétés membres. En outre, John Plant et moi avons participé aux réunions du conseil d'administration de certaines sociétés membres et avons ainsi pu décrire les programmes et services de l'ICI.
5) Enrichir le programme de distinctions en publiant des annonces (avant et après l'événement) dans les bulletins des organismes professionnels. L'augmentation de 40 % du nombre de participants au banquet annuel en mars dernier constitue une preuve encourageante du calibre des lauréats et de la popularité du programme. Il reste quand même beaucoup à faire pour assurer la promotion de l'événement auprès des non-ingénieurs, y compris auprès du monde politique, afin de sensibiliser davantage la société à l'apport de notre profession.
6) Enrichir le banquet annuel en y joignant une séance d'éducation/de maillage. Un conférencier invité devait parler d'un organisme qui vient d'être lancé au Canada, "RedR Canada" ("Registered engineers for disaster Relief un organisme à but non-lucratif qui certifie et qui forme du personnel technique pour aller en mission à l'étranger en cas de désastre), mais le projet a dû être annulé, faute de participation. Malgré cette déception, je persiste à croire au potentiel que représente l'enrichissement du programme du gala annuel en y ajoutant un atelier ou une conférence sur un sujet qui intéresse l'ensemble de la profession (ex. : les ramifications de l'accord de Kyoto) et j'entends continuer mes efforts dans ce sens.
Pour terminer, j'aimerais souhaiter la bienvenue à la Société canadienne des ingénieurs seniors (autrefois l'Organisation des membres à vie), qui a été acceptée à titre de membre à part entière de l'ICI en septembre 2002. Je tiens aussi à souligner l'excellent travail de notre directeur exécutif, John Plant, et notre agent d'administration, Huguette Findlay, qui expédient les affaires quotidiennes et assurent au
conseil de l'ICI et à ses comités un appui exceptionnel et enthousiaste.
Administration:
There were no staff changes during the period of the report.
Administrative
procedures were refined and the filing system was restructured. The
administration
of the office is working well.
Council Members:
Guy Gosselin was elected President replacing Ken Putt who became
Past-President.
Maja Veljkovic was elected President-elect, and Richard Bathurst was
elected
Treasurer replacing Djouida Chenaf. Vijay Sood was elected Chair of the
Technical Professional Development Committee replacing André
Rollin,
Raymond Benson was re-elected chair of the Honours Awards and
Fellowships
committee and Raymond Findlay replaced Andrew Wilson as chair of
History
and Archives. Denis Beaulieu replaced Ronald Townsend (CSCE),
Andrew
G. Hart replaced Jules Thibault (CSCHE), Suzanne Lacasse replaced Kerry
Rowe (CGS) and J. E. (Ian) Wilson replaced David P. Jackson (CNS) as
members
of Council. The Canadian Medical and Biological Society decided to
leave
the EIC when Council ruled that all members must have audited financial
statements in order to be part of the Officers and Directors Insurance
policy.
Continuing Education:
Increased use of the registry was experienced with the number of
registration
now exceeding 20000. Eight new private providers were added during the
year, The Ontario Good Roads Association, BH Engineering Systems, The
Centre
for Transport Engineering and Planning, The Canadian Institute for
Energy
Training, Edumine, Machinery Condition Monitoring Inc., RedR Canada and
Thermoshare Inc. On the down side, the following did not renew their
membership:
St Clair College, The Southern Alberta Institute of Technology, The
Universities
of New Brunswick and Saskatchewan and JOT.
HAF 2003:
This major activity of the Institute was the most successful in memory
with an attendance of 241 vice 171 in 2002. Nineteen Fellows, five
medal
winners and two Honorary Members were recognized. The awardees and
their
award citations can be found on the website at
http://www.eic-ici.ca/english/tour/haf2.html.
The mood at the event was very positive.
Sustaining Members Campaign.
Despite our efforts the revenue from Sustaining Members continues to
decline. The problem is seen to be one of being unable to find
appropriate
contacts in companies to approach.
Membership:
The number of Member societies remained unchanged however, the CMBES
departed and the Life Members Organization became a member society with
their name changed to “The Canadian Society for Senior Engineers”.
EIC Career Site:
This web based enterprise, launched in 2001, performed reasonably well
with approximately 3000 job applicants providing their curriculum
vitae.
Employer interest continued to be low what with the economic downturn.
Net revenues from this activity remained at zero as the income went to
paying down the marketing debt incurred last year with our partner
brainhunter.
Engineer’s Business Center:
The Engineer’s Business Center is a web-based activity that allows
registered members of the engineering community to conduct business
with
each other free of charge. Registrants can post and search for
opportunities,
events and offers. They can also make news releases, check credit
ratings
and post jobs at discounted rates. Registration in the center is
available to all members of the engineering community. They need only
register
through the EIC website. This service is being marketed to the members
of the member societies and our Participating Partners and Sustaining
Members.
Additional benefits have been added this year to attract registrations.
Unfortunately the Business Center is not yet capturing the interest of
the members of our member societies or sustaining members.
TREASURER’S REPORT
Djaouida Chenaf
Total revenues of the Institute including the Fund were $145,921 and total expenditures $131,455 for net revenue of $14,466.
The EIC Fund had revenues of $79,875 ($72,172 previous year) and expenditures of $65,284 ($64,859 previous year) for net revenue of $14,591 ($7,313 previous year).
Member society contribution was up from $31,695 in 2001 to $33,025 in year 2002. Sustaining member contributions were down from $45,100 in 2001 to $40,900 in year 2002. Revenue was up in the continuing education program with $21,040 received compared to $18,345 revenue in 2001, a 14.7% gain.
Expenditures were down 8.5% (ie. $131,455 compared to $143,738) compared to the 3.9 reductions in 2002 over 2001. The EIC spent approximately $827 less in office rent and office equipment. Professional and consulting fees increased to $2230. in year 2002 from $1558. in year 2001. Salaries and benefits increased to $79,716 compared to $78,223 in 2001 an increase of $1,493. Expenditures on the continuing education program decreased from $15,327 to $2,171 primarily due to a reduction in travel costs for recruiting Participating Partners and workshops and on membership services likewise from $ 8,117. to 8,095. In the latter case travel cost were reduced due to the conversion of one Council meeting to a teleconference and the cost of Director’s insurance increased by approximately the same amount.
Investment income decreased from $28,530 in 2001 to $27,831 in 2002.
The EIC Fund continues to be controlled by an independent Board of
Trustees,
established in 1996. The Board met twice in September 2002 and in
March 2003 and approved a balanced budget for 2003.
Audited financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2002,
for the Institute and the Fund, have been prepared in bilingual form by
the Ottawa firm Brian D. Watson Chartered Accountant appointed as EIC
auditors
are enclosed in this Annual Report. As recommended by the
auditors
in 1999, the financial positions of EIC’s Operations and the EIC Fund
are
presented in separate financial statements to simplify tax filing and
clarify
the independence of the two funds.
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY'S REPORT
Suzanne Lacasse, President
The Canadian Geotechnical Society delivers broadly based, multi-disciplinary programs and services to its members. At the annual meeting of the Board of Directors of the Society in Niagara Falls ON in October 2002, the President reported that almost 100 local meetings, workshops, short courses and conferences were held during the past year. Membership at the end of 2002 was 1286, up more than 10% from the number at the end of 2001. The budget was very close to being in balance and reserves remain strong.
The Society has local groups in about 20 Canadian cities in all parts of the country. There are technical divisions for Soil Mechanics and Foundations, Rock Mechanics, Engineering Geology, Geosynthetics, Cold Regions Geotechnology, Geosynthetics, Geoenvironmental Engineering, and Hydrogeology. There are also five technical committees for Landslides, Professional Practice, Computing, Membership, and Education.
The 55th annual Canadian Geotechnical Conference in Niagara Falls in October 2002 was again very successful technically, socially and financially. It attracted almost 500 delegates and more than 200 technical papers. It involved a three-day joint conference in conjunction with the Canadian National Chapter of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. During 2002, the Society was involved with the following conferences and workshops:
a) 2nd Canadian Specialty Conference on Computer Applications in
Geotechnique,
Winnipeg MB, April 2002
b) International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, in
conjunction with Technical Committee TC2, Int. Society Soil Mechanics
and
Geotechnical Engineering, St. John's, Newfoundland, July 2002
c) International Specialty Conference – North American Rock Mechanics
Symposium, Toronto ON, July 2002.
d) In addition, many of our local groups held short courses, workshops,
etc. of one to two days duration, and several were held in association
with the annual joint conference in Niagara Falls.
The Canadian Geotechnical Society strongly supports the objectives and activities of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). During recent years, Canada hosted five Technical Committees of the thirty or so committees sponsored by the International Society. Recent activities include presenting an extensive ‘slate’ of more than 50 members of CGS for positions on ISSMGE Technical Committees during the coming four years. In conjunction with NRC, the CGS is preparing to bid to host the 2009 ISSMGE Conference in Niagara Falls, Ontario. The bid will be presented to ISSMGE Council in Prague in August 2003.
Future plans include the Society's annual conferences in Winnipeg (2003), Quebec City (2004); and Saskatoon (2005). The following conferences are planned for 2003: ICOLD Symposium on Tailings Dams in Montreal; 2nd International Symposium on Contaminated Sediments in Quebec City; and 3rd Canadian Conference on Geotechnique and Natural Hazards in Edmonton. The following Specialty Conferences are being planned for 2004: 1st Canadian Conference for Young Geotechnical Engineers and Geoscientists in Quebec City; and the First International Conference On Environmental Technology, Practice And Policy, London ON. .
The Canadian Geotechnical Society runs a website with separate web pages for each of its divisions, regions and committees. It is linked to the website of the Engineering Institute of Canada and many other national and international organizations. The Canadian Geotechnical Journal (NRC Research Press) continues to produce a large number of excellent technical papers in 6 issues per year. The Journal ranks among the top three Geotechnical Journals in the world and is seen as a truly international journal. Electronic access to the Journal is now available to Canadians at no cost via NRC. The magazine Geotechnical News is published in Vancouver independently of the CGS, but by agreement with the publisher carries about 6 pages of CGS News items in each issue. It provides news items to its readership in both the CGS and the US GeoInstitute. Additional information is provided to members using the Society’s website and email listings.
Improved levels of sponsorship from Canadian industry to our sister non-profit organization The Canadian Foundation for Geotechnique permitted two Cross Canada Tours in the past year. These were given by Dr. Tim Law, Carleton University, Ottawa and Professor Stephan Jefferis from Surrey University UK.
The CGS remains highly active and is attracting many young men and women into general membership and acceptance of responsibility for organizing its programs. The Society sees its principal role, and the role of the EIC, as providing opportunities for the professional development of its members. It is well aware of the role of the Associations and Ordre in ensuring ongoing competence. It seems to the leaders of the CGS that a concerted effort by EIC and CCPE would be valuable, perhaps as a quadripartite initiative in conjunction with the Canadian Academy of Engineering and the Association of Consulting Engineers of Canada.
The Society supports initiatives such as those being undertaken by EIC and others to increase the public awareness of engineers in Canada. The Society encourages greater levels of collaboration at local, national, and international levels. In this regard, we have recently entered a collaboration agreement with the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and are in discussions with the Deep Foundations Institute. Recent annual conferences have been joint ventures with the Canadian National Chapter of the International Association of Hydro geologists (IAH-CNC), and this year’s conference also includes cooperation with the North American Geosynthetics Society (NAGS).
CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING REPORT
Andrew Hart, Prsident
The Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering (CSChE) is the national technical association representing the field of chemical engineering and the interests of chemical engineers in industry, academia and government. The Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering brings together the diverse chemical engineering community to exchange knowledge, and enables its members to provide responsible technical leadership to benefit society. Its core purpose is to advance the principles and practice of chemical engineering in Canada for the benefit of society.
Membership
Membership, which had been steadily declining throughout the last decade, is enjoying a second consecutive year of stabilization and even, if not resurgence, then at least modest and encouraging growth. This continues to be due to the larger number of undergraduate and graduate students that became members as well as members that have registered through our alliance with our American and Mexican partners.
Alliances
Under the umbrella of the Chemical Institute of Canada (CIC), the CSChE cooperates with two sister-organizations, the Canadian Society for Chemistry (CSC) and the Canadian Society for Chemical Technology (CSCT), to promote the chemical profession in Canada.
In 2000, the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), the Instituto Mexicano de Ingenieros Quimicos (IMIQ), and the CSChE signed an international partnership (NAAChE B North American Alliance of Chemical Engineers). In the fourth year of this partnership, we continue to see members of the other two societies purchasing CSChE memberships. To date (April) 85 AIChE and IMIQ members have purchased memberships (up from 76 for the whole of 2002). paid for a CSChE membership. Unfortunately progress on other elements of the Alliance continues to be extremely slow. The IMIQ are very difficult to contact, the AIChE have significant internal financial issues to address.
We did meet with the AIChE in their Manhattan offices in February. The main focus of the meeting was to discuss collaboration in professional development activities. Since then continuing aversion to travel in the US has led to the cancellation of a number of AIChE events, including one in Toronto that we had arranged to participate in.
The CSChE is a member of the Engineering Institute of Canada (EIC), which is formed of most engineering societies with the goal work together to enhance the engineering profession in Canada. Our permanent representative, and sitting vice-president, Jean-Francois Legault, maintains close contact with the EIC.
Conferences
The 52nd CSChE Conference took place in Vancouver (20-23 October 2002). The conference was extremely successful, and enjoyed Dept of Industry sponsorship. The constant support of the National Office in the organization of this conference was a major contribution to its success.
The next CSChE Conferences are planned for Hamilton (26 to 29 October 2003), Calgary (2004), Toronto (2005) and Québec (2006).
Finances
The Board of Directors, following the establishment of the strategic
plan, decided to use some of the equity to implement some of the major
actions. This was a wise move to revitalize the CSChE and to make it
more
appealing to its members. The deficit for 2001 was significantly more
than
expected because of a deficit instead of a surplus from the CSChE
Halifax
Conference, which was held just after September 11th. The CSChE is
committed
to achieve a balanced budget and hopefully a surplus to rebuild part of
the equity. We made a significant step in 2002 when we came close
to eliminating our annual deficit. We expect to balance the
budget
this year and move forward from there.
Technical Divisions
The technical divisions of the CSChE/CIC are doing very well and offer an opportunity to chemical engineers to network with other engineers in the same area. The newly created Process Safety Management (PSM) is very active and doing very well, and has attracted new members into the Society. We are reaching out to members of our Economics and Business Management division to take it forward.
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Due to the hard work of the National Office, a business plan has approved for the Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE). The journal is now available online, as well as being available on paper. It is possible that in the coming years, the journal will be offered in its electronic version only.
CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING'S REPORT
Michel Langelier, Executive Director
“A Society of Choice – Time to Act”
In May 2002, when the Government of Canada launched Canada’s Innovation Strategy, businesses, industry and labor organizations were consulted to define avenues for improving Canada’s innovation performance. This process led to a National Summit on Innovation and Learning wherein the Prime Minister’s speech laid out a proposed Five-Point Action Plan on Innovation. His ambition is “to make Canada a learning society, where learning and upgrading become continuous”, in a world where innovative technologies have a high correlation with a community’s higher standard of living and level of prosperity.
To respond to the Federal Government Agenda, CSCE and its partners have presented a brief to Minister Alan Rock, explaining the importance and challenges ahead in meeting the gaps specific to the Civil Infrastructure System (CIS) industry. During our Annual Conference, the outcomes of the five Town Hall Meetings, part of the Technology Road Mapping process, will be summarized in a final report and will be publicly released during a press conference. This will provide the public and the engineering community a list of actions that all stakeholders within our community should envision to act on in the next decade.
Being the public custodian of the CIS, our profession is compelled to find new ways to ensure that public safety will never be jeopardized and that the innovative solutions being proposed will contribute to the long-term prosperity of our society.
During the last year, CSCE has taken part in several other processes to revitalize Canada’s R & D efforts in terms of infrastructure and construction. As well, leadership efforts have been deployed to promote the mobility of a skilled labor force through our involvement with the North American Alliance for Civil Engineering and the establishment of a National Internship Program focusing on guiding a “generation of leaders towards a sustainable tomorrow”. We have even re-invented our own learned Society through the establishment of a new governance model, with the determination of becoming a “Society of choice” for all civil engineers in Canada.
CSCE certainly has great ambitions, but we are convinced that by taking a leadership role on key issues, we can strengthen our ties with all other associations in order to unite our efforts in keeping Canadian healthy and prosperous.
CSCE has gained tremendous momentum since last year, and has attempted to represent a broader audience. More than ever, we are positioned to play a prominent role in making Canada a learning Society. We now have all the ingredients to fulfill our mission, and our vision.
It is a time when CSCE can demonstrate how we can best advance professional knowledge and the practice of civil engineering. It is now that we must “reach our new civil horizons”!
CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT'S REPORT
J. Gordon Thomson, President
The Canadian Society for Engineering Management (CSEM) continues to enjoy a steady and loyal following in Western Canada. The CSEM Chapters located in Calgary, Vancouver and Edmonton hold regular luncheon meetings that sponsor presentations from engineers from all disciplines. Elsewhere in Canada, CSEM has had less success in sustaining regular luncheon meetings despite numerous attempts.
Financially, CSEM remains solvent. Expenses in 2002/2003 were minimized in order to establish a stronger cash position. This strategy was successful in strengthening CSEM's cash position. Now, CSEM hopes to move forward with more tangible offerings to its membership and supporters.
CSEM's administrative centre will be moving from Ottawa to Kingston. CSEM was experiencing significant administrative problems from its supporting organization resulting in both Board and membership frustration. To overcome this, EIC HQ has offered to support CSEM administratively for a reasonable annual fee to be negotiated. This will result in much more timely responses to membership inquiries.
The Board of Directors continues to meet periodically by teleconference to discuss ways to improve CSEM's situation. CSEM will continue to participate as a member of EIC to the extent that it is capable of doing so.
CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING'S REPORT
Marc Rosen, President
The Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering (CSME) continues to focus on being a vibrant society that serves the needs of the mechanical engineering community and its members, and retains its important role in presenting a Canadian perspective on issues in mechanical engineering.
CSME held at Concordia University in Montréal in February the
International Conference on the Future of Engineering Education. The
event
was co-chaired by Concordia faculty members Nadia Bhuiyan and Paula
Wood-Adams
with the support of Rama Bhat, Chair of Concordia’s Department of
Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering and Senior Vice President of CSME. The
conference
included a variety of technical presentations and related events on
such
issues as how best to keep pace with advances throughout the world and
to disseminate the knowledge gained. A special symposium in the
conference
focused on the important issue of women in engineering and the goal of
attracting more women to the profession. There were also two
well-attended
panel sessions, one on interdisciplinary engineering programs and the
issues
surrounding them, and the other on re-engineering the aerospace
curriculum.
The latter event brought together a range of senior engineers from
academe
and the aerospace industry, and addressed the rapid evolution over the
last decade witnessed by aerospace industries. The conference provided
a wonderful interdisciplinary venue for engineering educators,
practitioners,
students and researchers to share views, ideas, research and
initiatives.
Several other activities are ongoing, in line with CSME’s efforts to
improve its services and activities:
· Efforts are being made continually improve the CSME web site,
and an updated and fresh was launched recently. I thank Amarjit Banwatt
for his efforts in this area. An initiative to translate into French
more
of the material on the web site is ongoing.
· Our committee and division chairs are working to develop new
programs and to improve services to our members.
· CSME continues to engage the mechanical engineering department
chairs as partners in working to improve the profession, and CSME is
thankful
to the chairs and their departments for their support.
Many exciting events and activities are planned for the future:
· CSME is co-sponsoring “Manufacturing in the Digital Age: A
Conference for Educators,” which is being hosted June 8-10, 2003 in
Oshawa
by the new University of Ontario Institute of Technology and Durham
College.
Focusing on the future of education in high-tech manufacturing, the
conference
aims to bring together companies from the software and equipment
sectors
and post-secondary educators from across Ontario and Canada to view,
test
and discuss tools and techniques for teaching. Topics covered will
include
3D and assembly modeling, rapid prototyping using stereo lithography
techniques,
high-speed (5 axis) machining and advanced CAM software, integrated
manufacturing
systems, quality control and digital inspection, digital data and model
sharing, distance delivery of manufacturing skills, and education best
practices.
· The 19th Canadian Congress of Applied Mechanics (CANCAM) is
being held at the University of Calgary from June 1-6, 2003. CSME
members
are involved in the congress, which provides an international forum for
communicating recent and projected advances in all fields of applied
mechanics,
and for the direct exchange of information among delegates from
industry,
research and academic institutions.
· The second CSME Biennial Symposium on Mechatronics will be
held in Calgary on June 2, 2003 in conjunction with the CANCAM 2003.
The
symposium seeks to foster active and stimulating discussion on
mechatronics
practice and education, especially from the perspective of Canadian
educational
institutions and industry. The symposium also covers electro-mechanical
systems, automation and controls, sensors and actuators,
instrumentation,
and industrial applications in such areas as aerospace, automotive,
manufacturing
and robotics. Dr. Jeff Pieper is the symposium organizer.
· The CSME Student Design Competition is tentatively planned
for May 30, 2003 at the Integrated Manufacturing Technologies Institute
on the campus of the University of Western Ontario in London, Canada.
Teams
of students in full-time attendance in an undergraduate program at any
Canadian university may enter the competition and compete for prizes
sponsored
by organizations to which we are grateful. Students interested in
participating
should seek information from the CSME web site (under Student Design
Competition)
or contact event-organizer Brian Thompson (edis@eng.uwo.ca). The final
entry date is April 15, 2003.
· CSME is also a sponsor of the 8th International Conference
on Mechanical Design and Production, which is being held January 4-6,
2004
at Cairo University in Egypt.
· CSME’s biannual Forum promotes the communication and transfer
of technology among industry, government agencies, universities and
R&D
laboratories. The 2004 CSME Forum is being organized and hosted at the
University of Western Ontario in London. The event offers a platform
for
national and international mechanical engineering experts to meet,
exchange
information, discuss recent research challenges, and explore problems
of
practical importance to the profession and related fields.
CSME continues to play a significant role in the Engineering Institute
of Canada (EIC), which is a federation of nine engineering societies in
Canada. EIC seeks to be the leading proponent of continuing education
and
technical professional development in the Canadian engineering
profession,
and is discussing its potential roles in advocacy on behalf of the
engineering
profession. CSME recently teamed up with EIC to create a new Engineers
Business Centre that provides links to jobs within the field. In
addition,
CSME members have access to EIC’s Engineers’ Business Centre, which
provides
access to discounted services from across the web.
I remind community members to nominate worthy individuals for CSME’s
honours and awards so that the society can continue to fulfil its
mandate
to recognize the achievements of its members and the mechanical
engineering
community. Many meritorious individuals, whose successes and
achievements
illustrate the important contributions to society that mechanical
engineering
have made, have been recognized by CSME in the past. But, I am sure
many
others deserve recognition at present, and I am confident that
mechanical
engineers will make contributions worthy of recognition in the future.
I thank the members of CSME for your support. Our society will continue
to work to ensure that it provides the kinds of services and activities
that retain your enthusiastic interest and attract new members.
IEEE CANADA'S REPORT
Mohamed El-Hawary, President
I am pleased to report that total membership of IEEE Canada as of December 31, 2002 was 15,796 with 207 Fellows, 965 Senior Members and 3,440 students. The number of voting members was 10,116. In a manner similar to the American Regions (1-6) we had a sustained decline in our membership. Clearly, we need to actively pay close attention to our membership retention and attractions.
The activities in IEEE Canada since the last report have included holding a Regional Committee Meeting in conjunction with the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering in Montreal. At the Caucus and Regional Committee meetings on Saturday and Sunday May 3-4, 2003, we had many distinguished guests on hand. Visitors included Mike Adler – President IEEE, Cleon Anderson - VP RAB, Marc Apter – Vice Chair Member Activities, Irv Engleson – Chair, RAB Strategic Planning, Ray Findlay – Past President IEEE, Bill Gjertson – Chair RAB Section/Chapter Support, Doug Gorham – Educational Activities, Cecelia Jankowski – Manager Regional Activities, Brian Lee – Membership Development, Mike Lightner –VP Publications, Francisco Martinez – Director-Elect Region 9, Manuel Rodriguez-Perazza – RAB Student Activities, and Dan Toland – Regional Activities.
We had presentations at the caucus meeting as follows:
§ Dr. Doug Gorham of the Educational Activities Department conducted the Pre-College Career Education workshop on Friday May 2, 2003. Some discussion took place regarding expanding the scope of the program to R7. It is noted that Dr. Gorham subsequently conducted the workshop in four other eastern Canadian Sections as part of the tour of Eastern Canada Council organized by Dr. Ferial El-Hawary Past Chair of Eastern Canada Council and currently Chapters Coordinator for IEEE Canada.
§ Dr. Bob Alden gave an update on IEEE Canadian Foundation’s activities. He would like to provide information to Section leaders and others within IEEE Canada. Moving from listening to applications at all four meetings to an annual basis. Supplementing all English pages with French to accommodate forms and applications in both languages. Asked all Sections to look at the grants and scholarships and let their student branches know they are available. Web site now has a French URL.
§ IEEE Membership Development Chair Brian Lee discussed the current membership development activities.
Caucus then devoted about 45 minutes to the IEEE Presidential
Candidates
Forum:
· Cleon Anderson provided a position statement and gave a short
presentation.
Mike Lightner gave an overview of his position statement and a short
presentation
· Vijay Bhargava spoke and announced that he is withdrawing
from
the Presidential election as he has taken on a new position with
considerable
responsibilities at the University of British Columbia.
After the presentations a question and answer period was held.
The following activities were then reported:
a) Create links from Section Web sites to the IEEE Canadian Foundation
(ICF) web page. Charge to all Section Chairs.
b) Link all student web pages to the ICF and maintain their branch
information – All Section Chairs to pass on to student branches
c) Promote donations to the ICF through newsletters (inform
sections
of what the ICF does) – All Section Chairs.
d) Section Chairs look at the History Centre website, send back input
to Wally Read.
e) Section Chairs to look into milestone program and put forth
suggestions to IEEE.
f) Investigate the status of the inactive student branch(s) in Sections
and chairs to contact them to evaluate whether the branch should be
dissolved
or not .
For the Sections Congress 2008 Canadian bid, we had agreed to put forward only one bid. We had agreed also to have one Section bid per Council. Both the Québec and the Southern Alberta Sections made presentations on behalf of the Eastern and Western Canada Councils.
Ad hoc Committee on Publications – Wally Read gave an overview of the activities of the findings of the ad hoc committee on Publications as outlined in his report.
From the Eastern Canada Council it was reported that the Ottawa Section will distribute information to other Sections on credit cards for Section use, and will put a bid in for the CCECE06 conference.
From the Central Canada Council it was reported that the IEEE Toronto created a banner for their centennial, and CCC recommended that all Sections in CCC get banners made up to promote their Section. Will exchange newsletters with other CCC Sections. A web site will be created for CCC.
Vijay Bhargava reported on conference activities and thanked Witold Kinsner for an extremely successful conference CCECE02. Vijay Sood spoke on this years’ conference. – Bob Hanna spoke on the preparations for CCECE04conference that will be held in Niagara Falls, Ontario. The conference Theme will be “Technology Driving Innovation”. CCECE05 have asked the two Saskatchewan Sections to co-host. CCECE06 will be held in Ottawa. CCECE07 – will ask the committee to hold the conference in Vancouver, as it is the 20th anniversary of the conference.
The Canadian Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering
Editor,
Om Malik stated it has been a pleasure editing the Journal for the past
5 years and wished the best of luck to the two new co-editors.
Witold
Kinsner thanked Om for his diligence in keeping the Journal as a high
quality
publication.
Marc Provencher gave a brief overview of what the translation committee does. The Translation Committee Charter was approved later at the Regional meeting.
We also had an IEEE Canada Presidential Candidates Forum
· Bob Hanna gave a brief presentation on his candidacy
· A fact sheet was distributed on John Plant who could not
attend
the meeting.
At the Regional meeting, we had a RAB Update – Cecelia Jankowski/Cleon Anderson – Cleon spoke on the activities in RAB. CJ spoke on new programs within the IEEE and the Regional Activities Department hierarchy. IEEE Canada thanked all IEEE staff for their efficient service to the volunteers and members.
It was agreed that IEEE Canada conduct a survey to determine the value to members of the current publications. It was also decided that he Canadian Review Editorial Board set a goal to publish the Canadian Review in both French and English and submit plans to implement this goal at the Fall 2003 meeting. The WEB and the Electronic Newsletter should be encouraged to continue French and English presentations using volunteer translators. IEEE Canada will look into government funding for translation
CANADIAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY'S REPORT
J.E. (Ian) Wilson, President
Prepared by Parviz Gulshani
CNS Organization
The Canadian Nuclear Society (CNS) is a not-for-profit corporation. It is a technical society whose members are primarily individuals interested or involved in some area of nuclear science and technology. The CNS also accepts as members’ educational institutions such as libraries.
The primary objectives of the CNS are to promote the exchange of information and encourage education in nuclear science and technology, and to enhance the professional and technical capabilities of its members.
The CNS conducts its affairs through a Board of Directors (or Council), whose members are elected by the membership. The CNS is organized into Branches, Technical Divisions and Committees. The Branches are established in different regions of Canada and organize local functions in fulfilling the CNS goals. The Technical Divisions organize conference, symposia, seminars and courses on topics of interest to its members in nuclear science and technology. CNS Committees are established as needed to manage or carry out activities of the Society.
The CNS communicates special events, news and other technical matters to its membership through its CNS Bulletin (published quarterly), through its newsletter C-News (issued periodically), via frequent e-mails to the membership, and via .its website (www.cns-snc.ca).
2002-2003 CNS Activities
In the year June 2002 – June 2003, CNS activities were as follows.
The Technical Divisions organized a number of conferences, symposia,
and workshops:
· CNS 23rd Annual Conference and Student Conference, Toronto,
ON, 2002 June
· Steam Generator Conference, Toronto, ON, 2002 May
· CANDU Reactor Safety Course, Kincardine, ON, 2002 September
· CANDU Fuel Technology Course, Elora, ON, 2002 October
· Nuclear Simulation Symposium, Ottawa, ON, 2002 November
· Symposium on Canadian Perspective on Protection of the
Environment
from the Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Ottawa, ON, 2002 December
· CANDU Reactor Material Chemistry Course, Cambridge, ON, 2003
February
· CANDU Reactor Safety Course, Mississauga, ON, 2003 April
· CNS 24th Annual Conference and Student Conference, Toronto,
ON, 2003 June
The following events are currently being organized:
· 8th International Conference on CANDU Fuel, Honey Harbour,
ON, 2003 September
· 6th International Conference on CANDU Maintenance, Toronto,
ON, 2003 November
The following are in various stages of planning:
· An article on nuclear fuel waste management in view of the
new Nuclear Waste Management Organization established by the Federal
Government
of Canada.
· Quality Assurance Course, 2003 Autumn
· CANDU System Life Management Workshop, 2003 Autumn
· Waste Management Symposium, 2003 Autumn
Activities of the CNS Technical Committees were as follows:
· The Intersociety Affairs and International Liaison committees
continued to maintain collaborative ties with sister nuclear and other
technical societies within Canada and abroad. CNS Council
entertained
a delegation from the Finnish Nuclear Society in Toronto, 2002
October.
The Intersociety Affairs Committee has continued its efforts over the
years
to establish a CANDU display at the Ontario Science Center.
· The Education Committee continued its efforts to educate the
public on nuclear science and technology. It organized an event
in
2002 June on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the first
generation
of electricity by nuclear means in Canada, by the Nuclear Power
Demonstration
(NPD) reactor in Rolphton, ON. It has also erected a plaque
commemorating this anniversary on Highway 17 near Rolphton.
· The CNS nominated NPD for the American Nuclear Society’s
Historical
Nuclear Landmark Award, and this nomination was successful. The
ANS
President will present an Award plaque to NPD at the CNS Annual
Conference
in 2003 June.
· The CNS is considering setting up a bursary program for CNS
members and their children. Over the years, the CNS has donated
educational
materials and financial support to schools, libraries, etc..
· The Internet Committed has instituted a “nuclear history”
page on the CNS website, as part of the continual update of the CNS
website.
· The Honours and Awards Committee has awarded a number of
Canadian
Nuclear Achievement Awards to members of the nuclear industry for
valuable
contributions.
· The Fusion Committee has been involved in efforts to bring
the ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) project to
Canada.
Branches:
Each of the CNS local Branches organized activities appropriate to
its local region. These activities included:
· Seminars presented by speakers on various areas of interest to the Branch membership. Some of these speakers were invited from EIC member societies.
Participation in student engineering and science fairs, judging exhibits and presenting CNS awards to the winners.
MARINE TECHNOLOGYSOCIETY'S REPORT
Ferial El-Hawary, President
This is the 2nd year for the MTS being one of the EIC member
societies. MTS has a great interest in promoting and up-dating on
the marine related technology in all sectors: Off-shore resources
(Oil and Gas), Navy and Defence, Government Agencies and Academia...
MTS Objectives:
Disseminate marine science and technical knowledge
Promote and aid education of marine scientists, Engineers and
technicians.
Advance the development of the tools and procedures required to
explore,
study, and further the responsible
and sustainable use of the Ocean.
Provide services, which create a broader understanding of the relevance of the marine sciences to other technologies, arts, and human affairs.
MTS International Activities
Conferences and Specialty Workshops
The Offshore Technology Conference "OTC" is the major annual event,
which is co-sponsored with 12 other Societies.
This conference is very large and takes place in Houston, TX every
year in the month of May.
The OCEANS Conference is an annual event, which is co-sponsored only
with the IEEE/OES Oceanic Engineering Society.
MTS has an Awards and Recognition Program
MTS Publications - Journal and Newsletter "CURRENTS".
MTS Students Scholarship
MTS Council Meetings
A brief history on MTS society since 1962 has been submitted
direct to EIC/History & Archives Committee as a History Report.
MTS Canada - Canadian Maritime Section
I am very pleased to report on number of MTS activities
since
last Spring'2003 meeting:
Now, I am promoting Canada (Either Vancouver or Quebec City) to be
the
site of one of the future MTS/IEEE OCEANS Conference for the year 2007
or 2008, with providing the leadership and support.
Our local MTS/Canadian Maritime Section Executive had a meeting in
May '03 with "Robert Winokur" who is the MTS/V.P. Eastern Region to
discuss
the local activities and membership. The recommendation is to team up
with
other local marine oriented society, since we have many of those
societies
in the Canadian Atlantic.
Website Development: MTS/ Canadian Maritime Section has established
its own Web Page for the first time.
This page has been linked with the MTS Website as well
as with the EIC Website. There is a continuous up-date. Please
visit:
< www.mtsociety.org>
I will be participating in next July Conference Call with the MTS/Council.
The Winter Issue of the Marine Technology Society Journal, February,
2003, Volume 36, Number 4 "Renewable Ocean Energy -- An Overview of the
State of the Art" is now on-line as an electronic publications.
http://www.mtsociety.org/publications/journal/winter2003/index.cfm
To have access to the full Journal, as well as other benefits such
as
the
message Board and MTS directory, you must log in with your user name
and password. You will have two options for reading the Journal. The
first is to download the Journal as a PDF. If you have a dial-up modem,
this option will take roughly 30 minutes. The second option is to link
to the individual articles.
CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR SENIOR ENGINEERS
Len Bateman, President
Report 2002– 2003
We held our Annual Meeting on May 31st 2003 in Ottawa. It was preceded by a mixed dinner with 26 in attendance The Board of the Life Members Organization ratified the name change. The name of the organization will henceforth be known as The Canadian Society for Senior Engineers. We are working on a new Logo and letterhead and will hopefully get these incorporated into the EIC web page soon.
We have some renewed interest in the organization. The name change has brought many favorable comments and those who supported the Life Members Organization in the past with their financial contributions have continued to do so, and a number of others are also contributing to the work that we do. There seems to be a real desire among senior engineers to have an opportunity to fraternize over a luncheon or dinner featuring an interesting speaker. Luncheon meetings are presently being held in Victoria, Vancouver, and Winnipeg, and efforts are being made to extend this to Calgary and Edmonton and other Eastern Cities.
Our support of the Youth Science Fair and the other activities such as the ALTA Project, Spaghetti Bridge Project and other activities designed to encourage the youth in our school system to pursue a career in Engineering or the Sciences has been very rewarding. We have seen some very interesting projects developed by students of all ages. In fact, the winner of the National competition of the Youth Science Fair in the Life Sciences Division was a grade 7 student from Thompson, Manitoba. Her project “Driven to Distraction” won her $10,000.00 and the Platinum Award for the best junior project.
We produced our Newsletter for mailing on May 2nd 2003,and in addition to reviewing the history of our organization, we covered the activities of the past year. We also included a section on sustaining members and asked our members to help the EIC in recruiting sustaining members. I have sent one company name to Dr. Plant for his follow-up. It is necessary to work closely with Dr. Plant on these activities.
It is obvious when we send out a mailing, by the number of returned
letters, that our Life Members are becoming a vanishing group. It
is for this reason that we have opened the membership to any senior
engineer.
We again humbly request the other Member Societies of the EIC to
provide
us with some help in this recruiting process, either by providing us
with
the list of their retired members, or by advertising in their
publications
the opportunity to keep in touch with all branches of the profession,
by
joining The Canadian Society for Engineers. There is no entrance
fee or annual fee.
However donations to carry on the work are acknowledged with a
charitable
receipt, which may be used for a tax deduction.
HONOURS, AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS COMMITTEE'S REPORT
Raymond Benson, Chair
The Honours Awards and Fellowships (HAF) Committee concluded their work for the year 2002, with the successful annual EIC meeting held on March 2, 2003. Twenty-six of Canada's top engineers were honoured at the awards dinner convened in the National Arts Centre in Ottawa. Of the twenty-six persons so honoured, nineteen were inducted as Fellows of the Institute. Six received medals, and two new honourary member of the institute was accepted. Candidates selected for possible awards were initially proposed by the constituent societies of the EIC. Following, the committee selected the final candidates in accordance with the guidelines of the institute, and recommended a final list to the National Council of the EIC. The council made the final selection, with the process coordinated by John Plant.
Presentations of the awards were made formally at the March 1, 2003 banquet, hosted by Guy Gosselin, EIC President. Co-hosts of the presentations were Drs. Djaouida Chenaf and Ray Benson. Following is the current makeup of the HAF Committee.
The list of award winners is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fellowships:
|
Dr. Michel Aubertin Dr. Eric Dubois Dr. Paul Fortier Dr. Murray R. Gray Mr. J. Glynn F. Henry Mr. Norman E Jeffrey Dr. Jean-Marie Konrad Dr. Benjamin C. Lu |
Dr. Samuel Pierre Dr. Marc Rosen Mr. John Springfield Mr. Donald A. Taylor Mr. Gordon H. Thomson Dr. Frederick N. Trofimenkoff Dr. Yoginder P. Vaid Mr. Lorne J. White |
The HAF Committee was pleased to have been involved in the awards program for the year 2002 and is looking forward to participating in next year's program.
HISTORY AND ARCHIVES COMMITTEES REPORT
Andrew H. Wilson, Chair
From 1 June 2002 to 30 April 2003.
The Committee met for the second time on 6 October 2002, in Ottawa.
Its business was concerned principally with a review of its earlier
work
and consideration of program and project items for the next one-to-two
years. Relevant items from the Minutes have been included in what
follows.
During the year, regular reports have been provided to the EIC Council.
The Committee’s business, generally, has been conducted by e-mail and
regular
mail and, occasionally, by telephone. The Chair has also held meetings
with individual members of the Committee.
Membership of the Committee has not changed, in that those representatives who were serving at the beginning of the year were still serving at the end of it. During the year CMBES, which had failed to appoint a new representative, withdrew from the Institute and gave up its membership of the Committee. CSME failed to appoint a new representative, and MTS to appoint its initial one. Meanwhile, the presidents of these latter two Societies have been considered the pro tem members. While EIC/LMO became a new Member Society of the Institute in 2002, it has always been represented on the Committee.
Close contact has been maintained with Parks Canada and the National Archives of Canada, as well as with the Canada Museum of Science and Technology and the National Capital Commission. Contact has also been made with the Ontario Heritage Foundation (OHF), which would welcome the Institute and any of the Societies as participating commemoration partners. The Committee was represented at the plaquing ceremony for the Rolphton Nuclear Plant in June, sponsored and organized by CNS and OHF.
With regard to the Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada, the Committee was represented at the designation ceremony in Smiths Falls in July for the Bascule Bridge. It was also represented at the ceremony in Montréal in late November for the original Victoria Bridge and for the launching of the virtual exhibit for this bridge by the McCord Museum. CSCE participated significantly in this second ceremony. The Committee also made a ‘reinforcing’ recommendation to the Board for the designation of the Lethbridge Viaduct, which had been identified as a priority site in the Historic Engineering Landmarks Project (HELP) report commissioned by Parks Canada, as well as. One for the revival of the case for the designation of General A.G.L. McNaughton, which had been set aside some time ago by the Board. In early 2003 the Committee made two completely new designation recommendations to the Board on its own behalf and that of the Institute. And the Board staff has been asked to advise on the possibility that the material prepared for some or all of the engineers who have been designated as of “national historic significance” might be published.
The Canada Science and Technology Museum formally responded to the
Committee’s
letter expressing concern about some aspects of the process of
induction
to its Hall of Fame. It would appear that this letter had some
influence
on changes made by the Museum for the 2002 and subsequent inductions.
Although
it had made no recommendations to the Museum for 2002, the Committee
was
represented at the induction ceremony in early November. The Committee
did, however, make a number of recommendations for induction in 2003,
again
on its own behalf and that of the Institute.
The National Capital Commission’s Champlain Bridge project was
completed
during the year, but a second visit remains to be made to its “Canada
and
the World” exhibit in May 2003.
The Committee and EIC headquarters successfully concluded an agreement with the Portrait Gallery of Canada - approved by Council - whereby the Institute’s portrait of Sir Casimir Gzowski by J.W. Forster will be gifted to the National Archives for display by the Gallery
Three History Working Papers and a book review were published during the year, and as many as nine more papers are currently in process for editing and publication. Past President Weaver has produced a CD with the texts of the WPs already published. Headquarters published a short history of the Institute -contributed by the Committee -. The text is available in both official languages. A contribution was also made by the Committee to the website associated with the 2003 National Engineering Week. Additions and updatings to the History & Archives section of the EIC website were made from time to time throughout the year. CNS and CSCE, in particular, have been developing historical website material of their own.
New contributions to the Institute’s archives continue to be made. The organizing of this and existing material continues, and will do so into next year. Meanwhile, the Council approved at its March meeting an Archives Policy for the Institute, applying to both past and future material. The search is also on for what has been called the “third location” - in addition to the National Archives and EIC headquarters - for the storage of these archives. The individual Member Societies are responsible for the collection and storage of their own material. They may, however, consider the EIC policy as a model to be followed.
A study of the availability of public and private sector financial support for research and publication in the history of engineering has been completed. Studies are underway in regard to a separate engineering history database, the listing of engineers active in Canada in the 19th century, the possibility of developing material on engineering innovation suitable for radio broadcasts, and the possibility of instituting a prize for student contributions to Canadian engineering history.
The Chair has again responded to numerous enquiries from people in Canada and abroad in regard to the history of engineering in this country generally, and to the Institute and its membership in particular.
Perhaps the highlight of the year was that CSCE and its National History Committee received the 2002 Pierre Berton Award from Canada’s National History Society for its contributions to the popularisation of Canadian history. The Committee was represented at the presentation ceremony in Toronto in October 2002. More recently, CSCE named the Chair its W. Gordon Plewes Award winner for 2003. This award is given annually by the Society for contributions to the history of civil engineering in Canada.
The Chair of the Academy of Engineering H&A Committee has reported that his Committee’s “engine” has now been started up. Historical and archival activities have also been noted for CNS and CGS. The CSME History Committee remains inactive.
Finally, since this is my last (and longest) report to the Council, a word of thanks to all those who served with me as members of the Committee over the past four years, to the EIC presidents of this period for their encouragement and support, and to John Plant and Huguette Findlay at EIC headquarters in Kingston for their unfailing cooperation, understanding and assistance. Best wishes go to Ray Findlay, my successor, for a successful term leading the activities of the Committee.
Annex A
EIC PARTICIPATING PARTNERS
The following course providers are partnered with EIC to augment its
Continuing education and professional development activities
| BH Engineering Systems Ltd
British Columbia Institute of Technology Canadian Electricity Forum Canadian Institute for Energy Training Canadian Wood Council Concordia University CSA International C-TEP Centre for Transportation Engineering and Planning, University of Calgary Dalhousie University École Polytechnique EDUMINE EPIC Education Programs Innovations Centre GEO-Slope International Ltd. GECS (Global Education & Consulting Services) Golder Associates |
École des Hautes Études Commerciales
Kadon Electro Mechanical Services Ltd Machinery Condition Monitoring Inc
National Research Council Ontario Good Roads Association RedR Canada Royal Military College Ryerson University Thermoshare Inc. University of British Columbia University of Calgary University of Ottawa University of Toronto University of Windsor |
Tour of EIC: Vision
|
Objectives
|
Council
|
Member
Societies |
Sustaining
Members
Committees: Prof.
Development |
Honours
and awards |
History
and Archives |
Life
members
EIC Collaborators: CCPE
|
ACEC |
CAE
|
IACET |
IACEE
Continuing Education: Quality
Course Providers |
Guidelines
|
Registry
|
Transcripts
Info: What's
New |
Brochures
|
Annual
Report |
Upcoming
Events |
External
Links